Replies

RE :”It is, however, enlightening to see a wholesale admission here of this malicious game to belittle and besmirch fellow conservatives and good freepers. I would think that the powers that be on this forum might frown on that as THE goal, rather than focus on the dangerous people in Washington DC, who are destroying this nation. I guess attacking conservatives on the Internet is more “fun” and definitely easier than rolling up your sleeves and working to get rid of the enemy in Washington, eh? This is a very revealing, but not in the least surprising admission from the groupthink gang. I'm glad I stopped by here. “ (ohioWfan to NFHale at #41)

Any idea what this nutbag is referring to? Anyone know of an admission posted here to attack conservatives? Considering that she threatened to report me to the moderator more than once, don't you think if she found an admission like this (especially by those she dislikes) it would be reported?

that post was simply to trick you into pinging again...

she really is smitten with ya...

RE :”It is, however, enlightening to see a wholesale admission here of this malicious game to belittle and besmirch fellow conservatives and good freepers. I would think that the powers that be on this forum might frown on that as THE goal, rather than focus on the dangerous people in Washington DC, who are destroying this nation. I guess attacking conservatives on the Internet is more “fun” and definitely easier than rolling up your sleeves and working to get rid of the enemy in Washington, eh? This is a very revealing, but not in the least surprising admission from the groupthink gang. I'm glad I stopped by here. “ (ohioWfan to NFHale at #41)
Any idea what this nutbag is referring to? Anyone know of an admission posted here to attack conservatives? Considering that she threatened to report me to the moderator more than once, don't you think if she found an admission like this (especially by those she dislikes) it would be reported?

It's nothing but the usual RINO-bombast from FR's premiere Bush-idolizer who can always dish it out, but can't take it.

oWf (now pronounced "OAF") is quick to trumpet all of their deeds, contributions and accomplishments about what THEY have done for conservatism (and always demanding that everyone else state what THEY have done), that is the mark of a boaster and a braggart.

Now as for OAF's proclaimed conservatism, such claims become questionable when OAF continues to idolize and defend the biggest RINO to ever make it to the White House, George W. Bush.

She needs to give her head a shake when she starts hinting about 'the powers that be' on FR, for here is what our Founder had to say about her hero:

"A RINO is a Republican who either does not abide by the constitution or at a minimum is off the official Republican party platform more than he’s on it.

And, yes, Bush was a RINO. As is Romney, Rudy, McCain, Huckabee, Graham, Snowe, Collins, Arnold and many others.

I supported Bush even though he was a RINO and gave in to Arnold at the last minute, even went with McCain after he gave us Sarah (and ONLY because of Sarah). Never again!

It’s been proven over and over again that the two-faced lying liberal reach around RINO will screw you in the end every time!

That’s what the Tea Party rebellion is all about!

NO MORE BIG GOVERNMENT!! NO MORE SOCIALISTS!! And NO MORE RINOS!!"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2395256/posts?page=2034#2034

That alone should be clear enough even for the cult followers drinking that GWB-KoolAid.