Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left Still Isn't Over This Diebold Thing
Three Fingers of Politics ^ | March 9, 2010 | Stupac

Posted on 03/09/2010 9:27:34 AM PST by Superstu321

Man the Left is still really upset about Bush stealing all those elections I guess. So much so that a year after a democrat won the Presidency they’re still going after voting machine companies, and specifically the company formally known as Diebold.

The whole monopoly busting thing is a great cover for the Justice Department to use though. Just when these two companies were about to go create a super voting machine that only elected Republicans they stepped in and saved the day. Democracy everywhere is saved by Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at threefingersofpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: capitalism; diebold; holder; voting

1 posted on 03/09/2010 9:27:35 AM PST by Superstu321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Superstu321

Diebold, Birth Certificate, Recount, “Bush knew” ... some people never let go.


2 posted on 03/09/2010 9:28:59 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Superstu321

The only problem with this skreed is that there has been plenty of evidence that the voting machines haven’t complied with voting requirements of various states for supporting audits, code reviews, and reliability. There are multiple episodes of the machines recording votes incorrectly, etc.

My county (Alameda - home of Pete Stark no less) was using voting machines about 3 elections ago. They were easy to use. Yet they have ALL been trashed because of the respective company’s failure to create reliable systems.


3 posted on 03/09/2010 9:38:54 AM PST by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

I think I remember reading where Tennessee passed a law requiring all electronic voting machines to retain a hard copy of all votes. I would assume that the voter would be able to confirm the printout without being able to touch it unless it recorded the votes incorrectly.


4 posted on 03/09/2010 9:46:21 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

You’re absolutely right there is many issues with the source code of these machines. But my point was that I don’t think the government whether the R’s or the D’s are in power should be able to decide who gets to make the machines. Very fair point though. thanks though!


5 posted on 03/09/2010 9:51:54 AM PST by Superstu321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson