Posted on 03/26/2010 3:28:13 PM PDT by jxb7076
While all this is going on where the hell is AIPAC and what is their position on the strained relationship between the US and Israel? Besides influencing American Congressional members, raising funds, and denying the obvious - what are they going to do about Netanyahu, and why are they allowing him to help Iran?
Hmmmm!
(Excerpt) Read more at hubpages.com ...
Why is Jack Squat Barry and Hitlery helping Iran by nt cracking dwon on them? I know why: rhetoric is cheap and they have already accepted Iran as a nuclear fact. Netanyahu is doing nothing to help Iran when you have a Jack Squat administration that lacks the will to truly prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...hence, why they have accepted Iran as a nuclear fact, period.
Oh, geez.
Care to explain WTF you’re talking about?
The WTF is in the article. Read it and draw your own conclusions. If you agree great! If you don’t you’ll still sleep at night.
I agree with one thing you said. The US has accepted Iran as nuclear fact. Everything else is rherotical.
Oh good Lord. Israel, helping Iran? I KNOW Ahmadenijad would GLADLY TAKE help from Bibi and the “Zionists.”
Get real. Israel is quite possibly standing alone — and if they are not, then it’s more likely to be Egypt and Saudi Arabia that help them than it is our illustrious El Presidente.
OK, I get it...Bibi helped Iran by building “settlements” (in already settled parts of the capitol of Israel). Boo Hoo.
Bit of a stretch, really.
standing alone is fine and they are certainly within their rights to do so. However, the bigger picture is what they’re missing in this particular instance. The focus need to be on Iran - not Israel.
standing alone is fine and they are certainly within their rights to do so. However, the bigger picture is what they’re missing in this particular instance. The focus need to be on Iran - not Israel.
_______________________________
If by this you mean that we need to keep Iran from getting nukes, I heartily agree. But that’s the point you miss — if Iran GETS a nuke, they will use it, and their target of choice will be Israel. Specifically, Tel Aviv, Haifa and/or Jaffa. Israel is not only our ally and a democracy, they are endangered by a mutual enemy.
So far as I’m concerned, Barack Obama and George Bush before him have failed in protecting our interests and our allies from the designs of Iran, who wishes to dominate (if not conquer) the region, and to do so as a nuclear power. It appears to me that the focus IS on Iran — in Israel, but NOT in the United States. And that is the error of Barack Obama and many short-sighted (and quite frankly anti-semetic) people in Washington and our nation...
From my research Iran is already a nuclear power with the exception of nuclear weapons - and this admiinstration, just as the previous administration, know this to be true, otherwise we would have taken military action years ago. Also, Russia has backed Iran’s nuclear ambitions and continues to do so.
I believe all the talk about preventing Iran’s nuclear ambitions are just rhetoric in hope that it slows them down.
not really. the history is complicated and the culture is political. You can’t subdue Iran’s nuclear ambitions when your key alley takes actions contrary to strategic plans to prevent such ambitions. Iran knows this and has played their card well, so far.
I don’t buy the notion that building or not building anything anywhere will have the slightest effect on an irrational despot like Ahmadinejab.
Nor will anything else but raw power.
I think if Iran was already a nuclear power, Tel Aviv would be a heap of smoldering, radioactive ruins.... But I don’t think that’s far away at this rate. Once Ahmadenijad has a nuke he can toss toward Israel, he will. That’s why Israel MUST act now — and why we should have acted months or up to 2 years ago.
I agree!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.