I told you on the other thread.
Palin is not running for office. Defending Palin's support for McCain is the same as defending McCain.
Who cares if the libs are trashing her. She holds no political office and therefore carries no legislative power. In fact, she gave up that power.
You are trying to equate two different things. We supported Palin only because she was better than McCain.
Now you want us to support McCain again, because of Palin, over a better candidate - Hayworth.
You can't have it both ways.
Actually, Palin is not equivalent to McCain. Her support of him is not eqivalent to his political identity.
Please read the initial posting before replying to a thread.
I want McCain to lose too. But I doubt that it's going to happen.
EXACTLY! They miss the point that it is not a two part equation... This contest is a three part equation, involving a far better candidate: JD Hayworth. The issue cannot be reduced to that of Palin’s electability, because she is NOT running for office. So all the subterfuge that McCain supporters are throwing out so to diffuse legitimate criticism of Palin not supporting a true conservative (especially when it is McCain we are looking to oust) is plain bull crap. They are comparing apples and oranges. We are not disputing Palin’s credentials, we are disputing the logic of supporting a RINO SOB versus supporting a viable strong conservative. It may be politically expedient in some twisted way, but it is not the best move for the country... and especially now!