While maintaining his support for the goal of same-sex “marriage,” Schwarzenegger vetoed the law on the basis that the legislation was redundant and created the impression of different kinds of marriage, i.e. “civil and religious marriage.”
This shows where Schwarzenegger stands...
earned muted praise from pro-family advocates last week after he vetoed...SB 906, authored by the openly homosexual Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and supported by many homosexual groups, would have changed the Family Code to refer to "civil marriage" instead of just "marriage." The bill also stated that no authorized religious official would be forced to officiate a marriage against the tenets of "his, her, or its [sic] faith," and that religious entities would not face loss of tax-exempt status for refusing to do so... still would not have protected individuals who have conscience or religious objections to homosexuality, who are not ministers but who are involved in the wedding industry, such as caterers, photographers, and renters.
Something tells me that Gov. Blackhead thought that the bill was anti-homo. He needs to do his homework.