Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worse for Web Freedom: Hugo Chavez or the FCC?
Pajamas Media ^ | December 20, 2010 | Seton Motley

Posted on 12/20/2010 6:32:28 AM PST by Kaslin

The administration brings the Obamacare touch to the Internet.

Amongst many other unpleasant things, Venezuela’s Communist dictator Hugo Chavez is famous for yanking the licenses — and presences — of radio and television stations. He has, in fact, declared open war on all opposition media, silencing nearly any outlet that stands opposed.

This is information control — with Chavez seeking to ensure that no Venezuelan citizen learns anything beyond that which Chavez wants them to know.

Now, he has turned his Sauron eye to the Internet. An information-control bill has been presented to the Venezuelan parliament that includes some Internet regulation. As Reuters reports, the bill

proposes applying limits on content in “electronic media” according to the time of day, with adult content reserved for programing after midnight.

Such limitations already are in place for TV and radio programing. It was not clear how they would be applied to the Internet.

The bill also proposes allowing the government to restrict access to websites if they are found to be distributing messages or information that incite violence against the president.

Even by Venezuelan standards, that last proposition is over the top. Ominous and open-ended, left to the discretion of the enforcer — it’s very Chavez-esque, to be sure.

But how does it stack up against the latest efforts of our own Federal Communications Commission (FCC)?

In the FCC’s employ as its inaugural chief diversity officer is Mark Lloyd — a HAY-YUGE fan of Chavez’s “incredible, democratic revolution,” who loves the way Chavez “began to take very seriously the media in his country.” Which, as we have just seen, is hardly… pleasant.

As we have repeatedly observed of late, the FCC is hurtling towards an Internet power grab that would, it appears, make even Chavez blush. At the very least, Hugo seems to think he should be more democratic about his Web takeover.

Let us again highlight the fact that Chavez is proposing legislation. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has no time for such republican formalities.

The chairman is ramming through an authoritarian, 85-page Web order in last-minute fashion — behind closed doors, unreviewed, without public comment, under cover of Christmas. So will he allow a Democrat Party-line December 21st vote by three unelected bureaucrats to serve as justification for a government appropriation of 1/6th of our economy, and the implementation of the terrible idea that is network neutrality.

This despite the fact that the FCC has zero authority over anything, unless and until Congress writes a law giving them said authority — and Congress has never done that with broadband Internet. It’s a fact Chairman Genachowski knows and readily admits. This is to say nothing of the D.C. Circuit Court, which in April unanimously reminded him (and everyone else) that the FCC doesn’t have the juice.

The power grab sets up the chairman and his commission as overlords of… everything, potentially. If the chairman knows he’s not supposed to lord over the Internet and he does it anyway, what’s to stop him from later declaring his intent to lord over anything else? Everything else?

And from all we’ve heard, the chairman’s Web usurpation goes way beyond where the comparatively mild-mannered Chavez is trying to get with his legislation. I say all we’ve heard, because Captain Transparency — I mean Chairman Genachowski — won’t make public what he intends to do.

It all comes in the wake of his Day One proclamation that his FCC would be “fair, open and transparent” — and his once-upon-a-time description of his net neutrality emplacement process (which has now become a Congress-free rewrite of communications law):

I will ensure that the rulemaking process will be fair, transparent, fact-based, and data-driven. Anyone will be able to participate in this process, and I hope everyone will. We will hold a number of public workshops and, of course, use the Internet and other new media tools to facilitate participation. Today we’ve launched a new website, www.OpenInternet.gov, to kick off discussion of the issues I’ve been talking about. We encourage everyone to visit the site and contribute to the process.

What we are now being force fed represents none of this. This process is unfair, shrouded in mystery, willfully ignorant of the obvious facts, and thoroughly data-averse. Virtually no one has been able to participate. Instead, there is a brand-new, 85-page order — unposted on OpenInternet.gov, public workshops unheld, public comment period disallowed.

The latest layer of bureaucratic sludge to be slopped on top was a 2,000+ page document dump at the absolute last moment — a massive, last-minute filing that makes the process yet more opaque. It is patently absurd to accept an addition to the record of that size, this close to the vote date, and expect anyone — inside or outside the FCC — to pore over the thing in time.

This — all of this — is the rough FCC equivalent of Congress filing the 2,400+ page ObamaCare bill and demanding a vote on it two days later. Chairman Genachowski might as well paraphrase outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: we have to pass the order, and all the attending filings, so that you can find out what is in it.

We on the right routinely, rightly lambaste Hugo Chavez and his Marxist thug-ocracy — just as we regularly castigate Europe for diet versions of Chavez policies. But of late we have seen Europe pull back from Internet regulatory oblivion. And we’re now seeing Chavez engage the legislative process while our unelected bureaucrats are rushing to eschew it. Chavez could practically be said to be seeking far less statutory harm than our FCC is dead set on doing.

Being to the left of Scandinavia and France is bad enough. If we are now beyond the bounds of Hugo Boss — just how far from the path have we strayed?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: chavez; fcc; internet; lloyd; regulation; speech; takeover; venezuela

1 posted on 12/20/2010 6:32:29 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Socialists HATE Internet freedom.

They want the media to be all MSNBC, CNN, And The Washington Post.


2 posted on 12/20/2010 6:47:16 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Zero said it: Don’t Criticize... and so did McCain, Bush and all, because they are ball-less coward scums who cannot stand to see LIVE action of their death, that of their country and their nincompoopness at handling the crisis.


3 posted on 12/20/2010 7:03:27 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerACLUmember

It is obvious that the kind of immunity this gives governmebnt, lawyers, cops, leaders... the way Hitler or Stalin did, is quite attractive to these scums.

You got to be a special person to enter politics and have the arrogance to run the world without fear of hurting or making mistakes in the process. Of course, the more depraved and dysfunctional you are, the greater the tendency to be paranoiac in that respect and process.


5 posted on 12/20/2010 7:08:29 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obviously they are all being sneaky, disingenuous and do not want to assemble and discuss us out of slavery the way the founding fathers honorably did it, they want to maintain and force us in, in sin, disrespecting the hard work of small time artists, their inherent quality, only looking at the size of wealth and grand-petty lives of theirs.


6 posted on 12/20/2010 7:12:08 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What does money buy today? If it did not buy love then, it surely does today and has become worthless as a result.


7 posted on 12/20/2010 7:14:02 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Check out WSJ and all INfo here on why this is happening.
www.Globalwatch.webs.com


8 posted on 12/20/2010 7:41:29 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson