Posted on 04/02/2011 3:13:05 PM PDT by Creme Brulee
A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Well, thank goodness that’s settled.
So, this’ll have him ousted tomorrow?
No? More ineffectual fluff & puffery?
I guess the realists will just keep working to vote him gone
instead of relying on document magic to dissolve him.
Let’s say, for the sake of argument, this is true. What happens then? Supreme Court, impeachment? Neither seems very plausible. Whatever the circumstances of Obama’s birth, we’re stuck with him until 2012 at the earliest, in my view.
I’m not saying people shouldn’t pursue this, I just don’t think anything will come of it.
Just refer to him as the Imposter American, the fake, the Fake Flake from Kenya, Product of Kenya or any other label.
See What you can come up with. Enough good Ideas will make for good bumper sticker slogans.
BUT - it would call to question the validity of any laws he has signed, or any executive orders he has created and probably eliminate a run at reelection, I would think.
Please don't bother to QUESTION WITH BOLDNESS ,, there's nothing to see here...
Just one state needs to require evidence of birth place to get on the ballot for 2012. That would be very interesting.
So it’s not a medically “live” birth...no surprise there.
Those are coming regardless. When the occupants of inner city wastelands like Detroit MI and Camden NJ start to realize they aren't gonna get their free kitchens and concierge doctors, they are going to explode.
As usual, NOTHING happens, but the article does serve to answer the questions that are often asked about the birth announcement(s) - the questions that are usually meant to mock. I gave up (long ago) believing that his reign would come to an early end.
ping...
“I found thousands of birth registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their announcements published in these two newspapers by cross referencing the announcements with the U.S. Department of Health Vital Records Report for Hawaii.”
What we have is a man who was not properly vetted for the job because, to do so, would have had the race card thrown like a weapon.
BOR said the other night when he had trump on his show that it would be impossible for those birth announcements to exist without the hospital of birth calling it in and officially verifyiing obamas birth. What a bunch of horse s### BOR spews out of his mouth
“I gave up (long ago) believing that his reign would come to an early end.”
Alas! I agree. Obama is a blatant criminal tyrannical dictator and nobody (who can change it) cares =(
“The birth location is mistakenly implied by people because it appears in this newspaper. I also found several birth records in Japan for birth’s registered in Hawaii.” A review of all the birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 reveals other evidence suggesting a disconnect between the Department of Health and Hawaii’s hospitals.
“Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does. It appears that Obama’s birth was registered in an office not used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical Center which use two local offices near those facilities,” said Crosby.
He continued, “It appears Obama’s birth was registered with the satellite office near his grandparent’s home some distance from the offices nearest to and most used by the hospitals. This particular office was commonly used by indigenous people of Hawaii wanting to record births of children outside of the city.
This is why the U.S. Department of Health created the Certificate of Live Birth template in 1959 with a check box indicating whether or not the child was born in the city limits and if the residence of the mother was a farm or not.
It appears Obama’s birth at least did not occur in the city of Honolulu and, at most, did not even occur in the state of Hawaii.”
“Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does. It appears that Obama’s birth was registered in an office not used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical Center which use two local offices near those facilities,” said Crosby.
He continued, “It appears Obama’s birth was registered with the satellite office near his grandparent’s home some distance from the offices nearest to and most used by the hospitals. This particular office was commonly used by indigenous people of Hawaii wanting to record births of children outside of the city. This is why the U.S. Department of Health created the Certificate of Live Birth template in 1959 with a check box indicating whether or not the child was born in the city limits and if the residence of the mother was a farm or not. It appears Obama’s birth at least did not occur in the city of Honolulu and, at most, did not even occur in the state of Hawaii.”
“This also explains why Obama’s birth announcements appear in the succession of announcements where and when they do. His alleged “Certification of Live Birth” is not approved by any federal authority as an official source of demographic data or medical verification of his birth.
It is merely a record of birth registration. Therefore, the order of printing of announcements in the local papers comes directly from the list which is ordered based on the birth registration office location, not the chronological or alphabetical order of the medically verified birth.”
Crosby’s says the difference between “medically verified” and “registration” are significant.
He interviewed former Vital Records Adminstration, Martin Hesch in order to gain understanding of the different procedures and authorities used to create vital records and public announcements in a medical verification process as opposed to merely registering a vital event with a municipal office.
“I think people simply want to believe a simple equation to this issue,” said Hesch, when asked why he thought so many people ignorantly believe what they are told about Obama’s records.
“That is why they think that a birth announcement in a local paper is somehow an automatic indication of a local birth.
Unfortunately, they wrongly accept a locally appearing birth announcement as an indication of medically confirmed ‘local birth’ and that just simply is not the way it is in most cases in Hawaii in early part of its history.
The media also wants Barack Obama’s natal circumstances and documentation to fit the traditional record model because it is too disturbing to them to think that they were so easily deceived… but we also now know they do not fit this model.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
