Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2011 1:23:16 PM PDT by stevelackner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: stevelackner
All that's nice, but then "Honest Abe" came around.

ML/NJ

2 posted on 04/27/2011 1:31:37 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner
It seems as simple as a law that says it is illegal to cross the line of an intersection when the light is red. You go by what the lawmakers intended. But pretty soon, somebody says that they really didn't mean "red" specifically, but any color "like" red and pretty soon you have moral judgments stating the horrors of using red as a color.

Thus the Constitution has been wrested and rendered ineffective by our judicial activist judges.

4 posted on 04/27/2011 1:42:31 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

The Constitution is not a statement of general principles but a framework work for the federal government. The Bill of Rights specificly limit the authority of the central government. The problem is the way that legal positivism has displaced the old natural law approach. Every judge on the Supreme Court, even the Originalists, think like Justice Holmes. The idea is that the law must be reinterpreted to meet the needs of a changing society. Holmes was willing to let legislatures make the changes rather than judges, but as an atheist—and a man whose psyche had been shocked profoundly by the events of the Civil War—he lacked faith in anything except power. Justice White spoke of Roe, v. Wade as a raw exercise of judicial power. That is the way that judges think today. Take the case of the judge in Wisconsin, who did not hesitate to suspend the operation of a legislative act even though it involved her intervention in the operation of the legislature. The motto today is: See what you can get rid of.


5 posted on 04/27/2011 1:47:07 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner; humblegunner

In all sincerity, I want to say “Thanks!”

It’s great to see that there is someone in the blogosphere who is proud enough of his work and respectful enough of his fellow FReepers to post his essays in full right here.

(Now, I may actually go and read the whole thing!)


7 posted on 04/27/2011 2:39:47 PM PDT by shibumi (Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

“I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution. And if that is not the guide in expounding it, there may be no security.” —James Madison, letter to Henry Lee, 1824


8 posted on 04/27/2011 3:01:01 PM PDT by RoadTest (Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner
I'm a big fan of Randy Barnett. His Restoring the Lost Constitution should be read and quoted by every Freeper.

Barnett shreds the Left.


9 posted on 04/27/2011 4:30:59 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We are not governed. We are ruled. FUBO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson