Veddy in-terrrr-est-ink!...and probably very plausible!
Posted on 06/14/2011 6:00:44 PM PDT by rxsid
"Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: Retired CIA Agents I've Had Look At Obama's Birth Certificate Say It Is Fraudulent
Video: Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: I've had retired CIA Agents and Investigators look at Obama's birth certificate and 10 out of 10 say it is fraudulent. The interview aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund radio show 6/13/2011.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTMv2XAUHP4&feature=player_embedded"
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/fox-news-contributor-major-general-paul.html
;)
We just keep praying for our dear country and precious troops. When he mentions there are active and retired military who know ... that takes it to another level of
critical mass.
If you missed Gen Vallely’s comments, he addresses the fraudulent BC at about four minutes into the tape.
maybe. he’s definitely hiding something.
but it could be as simply as hiding the adoption by Soetoro, since he didn’t legally change his name back.
(which i think is related to why a Hawaiian has a Connecticut SSN... which is impossible to do legally.)
It certainly does. I am heartened by the fact that we have people monitoring this situation that know what they are doing...and are not just crackpots.
LOL
Me too .. that gives me something ... hope, encouragement ..that even they know. But it all comes down to: just who in the right position of authority will stand up, risk all and fight for this country. That’s the 64K question. Keep praying.
1. April 27, 2011, Obama releases his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference.
2. HAWAII REGISTRAR ONAKA: But now when reporters ask Hawaii official Onaka to allow them to examine the original birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, Onaka---as I understand it---declares that he cannot do so because of privacy laws.
3. Huh? I thought that when Obama VOLUNTARILY released his long form on April 27, 2011, the long form birth certificate became part of the public domain, that is, I thought that Obama gave up his right to hide behind privacy laws when he VOLUNTARILY released his long form himself on April 27, 2011.
4. Again, how in the world can Onaka---whose name is stamped on Obama's long form birth certificate---on the one hand, claim that privacy laws forbid him from allowing reporters to examine Obama's original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, when, on the other hand, Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011?
5. It makes no sense to me.
6. To me, it seems that Hawaii officials and Obama are trying to hide something damaging to Obama that is on the long form in the Hawaii archives but is not on the long form birth certificate that Obama released to the public on April 27, 2011.
7. PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR ONAKA'S STONEWALLING? Why doesn't President Obama simply tell Onaka to allow reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the HAWAII archives that should have the same EXACT information that is on the copy that President Obama released on April 27, 2011 to great fanfare at a White House press conference?
8. I think that Registrar Onaka and Obama are hiding something.
9. I wish that reporters and the public would put continuous pressure on President Obama during this 2012 presidential campaign to allow them to look at his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, because if Obama refuses to allow reporters to examine the original long form that is in the Hawaii archives, then I can only conclude that President Obama is trying to hide something.
10. And with every day that goes by without President Obama allowing reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, I say that President Obama loses another vote on election day Nov. 2012.
***They didn’t vote to convict Clinton because the public didn’t want it.***
They didn’t vote to convict Clinton because Gore would have become president and eligible to finish Clinton’s term, and then run on his own for the presidency. If he ran and won for a second term, he would have had something like ten years as president.
I’m wondering if there is even ONE in Congress with the integrity to openly challenge this corruption? The htreat of black people rioting is not enough to allow the nation to be destroyed, so why is there not even one congress critter with the integrity to use their office to get to the facts on the late-filed selective service registration, the fraudulent use of a CT social security number, the fraudulent thing ‘released’ on April 27, the lack of even one factual college record for the bastard? I know my two Senators in Tennessee are feckless fools, and I have discovered my congressional rep, Dr. Roe, is a cowardly pawn, but surely there is one who has the integrity to use their office for discobvering the facts and exposing this sonofabitch dog to the world! If not, this Republic is dead, because the pirate Roberts has squelched any aspect of the eligibility issue, so there is no other venue to right the ship of state.
Your old tax dollars finally at work
Sounds like the guys that were discussing this in that video are some of the ones that are risking their whole careers and credibility on knowing the facts and bringing them to light.
I just hope it resonates with the ones that count that can deal with this serious situation!
One of the nitwits in last night’s debate said he was the son of legal immigrants. I think it was Pawlenty? Doesn’t that disqualify him as “natural born”?
bookmark
Bump-mark.
Will history ever report this despicable chapter ..
I sincerely hope so! And I hope this chapter is a short one!
What’s the downside to a Soetoro adoption? That he was, for a while, an Indonesian?
It looks like another case of piss poor government forgery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.