ROMNEY REFUSES TO SIGN PROMINENT PRO-LIFE GROUP’S PLEDGE (Herman Cain also refuses)

The Blaze ^ | June 18, 2011 | Jonathon M. Seidl

[BushCountry]

It requires the President to advance legislation (we seen the horror of Obamacare).

[DannyTN]

"Then that is your choice. His bio has been posted maybe 300 times on FR the last 2 months'

It is my choice. And it's great that his bio has been posted, that's more than our current President has done.

I'm paying attention now, to what he is saying and doing, or not doing as the present case may be. If his cumulative actions and statements eventually warrant me reading his nicely edited bio, I'll do so.

[svcw]

I get this rebuke for I agree OR are you upset I said Romney is not pro-life in a previous reply?

[andyk]

Oh, darn. And I was so close to supporting him.

[Puddleglum]

how do you reconcile point 1 with point 4?

• •Only nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court and federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and applying the original meaning of the Constitution, not legislating from the bench;
• •Advance and sign into law a Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion.

I see two problems: point 4 excludes great masses of the unborn and makes "pain" a criteria on whether a human deserves to live or die; and also, it assumes that expanding the federal government is the way to solve this, not telling them to butt out and leave abortion law to the states.

[Puddleglum]

sorry - I got a 404 when I clicked. But I have since read the text - thanks much. an interesting topic.

[AmericanInTokyo]

That from me, svcw, DEFINITELY came out the wrong way and in no way was meant to be target to YOU. And for that I am deeply sorry. I can see now how you read it and could make that interpretation. Stupid me. I should have written that more carefully and more consideratly, so you knew in fact where I was directing my fire power.

[svcw]

:-)

[Kansas58]

Actually, almost every election is based on those who vote “against” and not “for” -—

The public did not know Obama last time around.

Now they do.