Hey Ed Rollins, you deal with it

Legal Insurrection ^ | 6/22/2011 | William Jacobson

[Lakeshark]

Your candidate is getting the predictable Palin-treatment, but of course, you have so pissed off Palin supporters, you deal with it. After all, you are a serious campaign consultant.

Michele Bachmann’s Holy War, at Rolling Stone, has this image accompanying the article, which says pretty much all you need to know: Your candidate is getting the predictable Palin-treatment, but of course, you have so pissed off Palin supporters, you deal with it. After all, you are a serious campaign consultant.

Michele Bachmann’s Holy War, at Rolling Stone, has this image accompanying the article, which says pretty much all you need to know:

[Lakeshark]

A lot of Bachmann's supporters are saying this was no big deal, that no one would care or notice. Just go to the comments on this blog to see if no one cares or notices that Ed Rollins is a dumb schmuck and that this wasn't a huge mistake on her part.

[Lakeshark]

Ping!

[RINOs suck]

If she is getting the same treatment Palin gets, how can she be a stalking horse for Mitt Romney or a candidate the media doesn't see a threat?

Those BDSers need to get their talking points straight.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

[gov_bean_ counter]

It will be death by a thousand cuts. For Mr. Ed's sake I hope there isn't video of her speaking in tongues.

[9YearLurker]

Nah, those are just a few love pats Bachmann has got so far. They’ve still plenty of use in building her up. But were they ever to need to take her down (e.g., if she actually joined Mitt’s ticket), they’d shred through her in no time.

The ‘Christian consulting’ family business? Those 23 former foster children to get through? Zero executive experience? Virtually no substantial legislation passed?

Ed doesn’t have to worry for probably a year, at least.

[parksstp]

Mark Levin has some choice words for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQnMFqthx4

[Maverick68]

Zero executive experience? Virtually no substantial legislation passed?

According to Democrats, that's Presidential material....

[Maverick68]

As Freepers, we need to remind EVERYONE we debate or engage, whether it be at home or on the Net:
The same media that’s telling you how stupid Palin or Bachman are is the same media that told you how brilliant and competent Obama was when he was running for office.....

[cripplecreek]

Looks to me like everybody but a handful of Palin supporters is defending her. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Sarah Palin herself come to her defense.

Its simply the right thing to do.

[Gator113]

This isn’t any where near what Palin has had to endure.

Whatshername-Rollins will regret her bonehead decision to hire Rollins for her very own hit-man.

[9YearLurker]

So true—for a black Democrat.

[FreeReign]

Looks like your Levin clip is dated May 16th.

[ngat]

Your question makes no sense. And your comment invents a creature that does not exist.

[parksstp]

So what? Michele Bachmann didn’t become a non-conservative when she hired Rollins. The man got taken to task when he made his comments and hasn’t been heard from for the most part since.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

;)

[FreeReign]

Looks like your Levin clip is dated May 16th.

So what?

Obviously May 16 is before the Bachmann camp's classless comments about Palin.

[radioone]

Looks like the “Obama/Soros/DNC/LSM media complex” finally received their marching orders.

What a “piece of cake” for the media. Pull up all the old trash stories about Sarah, and insert Michelle’s name and voila, an Instant News Story.

[Lakeshark]

I posted on thread about the original article what crap the article was. The blog post I just linked to is saying what an ass Ed Rollins is, implying he did the same thing to Palin that is being done to Bachmann in the article.

Admit it, the man is a jerk, and Bachmann should have dealt with it better.

[RichInOC]

Michele, this is exactly the type of thing the Eleventh Commandment was intended to avoid. Ed really is old enough to know better.