[Kleon]

If you looked at the link I posted... anyone with even the slightest observational abilities can see that more than one typewriter produced the “long form”. You are the one who is “ridiculous” and “pathetic”.

Considering the analog nature of the typewriter used, combined with artifacts that can be introduced by a modern image transfer, nothing in his analysis is the least bit surprising. The fact that he's even trying to do this kind of analysis on what is probably a copy of a copy is silly.

[fireman15]

This is the same type of silliness that has put many forgers in prison. It is the same type of silliness that disgraced Dan Rather when he was attempting to use forged documents to discredit President Bush. The document in question was released by the White-house; there are no recognizable “artifacts” from the analog to digital conversion that would cause the size and shapes of the letters to be distorted in the ways that are noted in the link I provided.

I do congratulate you on your strict adherence to Alynski tactics in your recent posts. You share virtually no credible information while sounding authoritative and then ending with each post with your attempts at ridicule. Bravo! You are certainly earning whatever compensation you are receiving from your efforts, even if it is just the admiration of your fellow posters over at the Democratic Underground. On behalf of the fraud currently occupying the White-house I congratulate you. He certainly would not be capable of destroying the country without the help of you and his many other dedicated followers.