Skip to comments.
Clintons Plotting their Comeback on the Smoldering Ashes of Hopenchange?
Reaganite Republican ^
| August 13, 2011
| Reaganite Republican
Posted on 08/13/2011 1:19:13 PM PDT by Reaganite Republican
In the delirious-sheeple afterglow of Barack Obama's 'historic' election victory in 2008, a strange thing happened that December: he appointed his critical -openly hostile-
and recently defeated primary opponent Hillary Clinton to the head the State Department... Was it based upon her qualifications?
Doubtful, considering that Shrillary had no foreign policy experience to speak of. Other presidents lacking diplomatic exposure have traditionally brought someone who themselves had such a background to the vital State Department position- alas, somehow Obama didn't feel the need.
But perhaps the most unsettling concern for many observers was the fact that Clinton's judgement is warped by her blinding ambition to gain power and control- causing her to be manipulative -even Machiavellian- in her dealings with others. Was this really the best person we could find to represent the United States of America to the world?
So then it was their friendship that brought her onboard Team Obama? Deep interpersonal respect? Ha ha ha- not exactly.
In addition to other puzzling cabinet choices from a guy pledging "change" -i. e. old-guard party aparatchiks like Joe Biden and (corrupt) primary challengers like Bill Richardson- the only explanation for these postings would be fulfilling political deals that got him nominated... as well as the calculated co-opting of Democratic rivals that 'could pose a challenge in 2012' when Obama's numbers are in the toilet (and lo-and-behold here we are, over a year early).
When you're talking about an unprincipled political punk like Obama who had all three other Democratic Party challengers thrown off the ballot in his very first Illinois State Senate race... a man who displays a history of serial political opportunism... the deduction that Hillary was chosen to cap her political ambition/potential seems obvious.
The appointment of Hillary Clinton to State was likely a political bargain struck at the convention- Obama wasn't about to let qualifications or ethical considerations get in the way of such a win-win deal that could hand him the ultimate prize on a platter.
Given the opportunity, it was a Team-Obama priority to control and contain Hillary, Richardson... even Biden. And if he hadn't suffered a most inopportune bimbo-n-bambino eruption, Silky Pony would have been appointed to a serious position in the Obama Administration, too... he was certainly angling for it.
So should it surprise anyone then if Hillary Clinton were to do a Bobby Kennedy...?
RFK was of course President Johnson's AG -inherited from JFK- and when LBJ's popularity started to slip, Kennedy turned and ran for President against him in the 1968 primaries. You don't hear it as much as you used to, but anyone saying the Democrats wouldn't run a serious primary challenge against Obama in 2012 doesn't know what they're talking about.
And you can never really count the Clintons out- they appear to have few interests outside of ego-gratification, power, and money (+ oh yeah sex)... and were almost certainly working on a post-Obama "plan B" from the minute the Bolshevik Boy Wonder was sworn in. There's no real loyalty between the two camps -nor love lost- and everybody knows it.
Although they are careful what they say, the calculating, insatiably power-hungry Clintons could simply be waiting for the exact right moment to expoit Dear Leader's accumulated defeats. It would be hard to imagine them not holding a grudge too, longing for revenge after the denial of a presidency they thought they owned.
Hillary ain't going down with the USS Obamanation, I'd almost bet on it- serving Chairman O to the bitter end is not the way the Clintons plan to end their self-absorbed legacy. And as for other Democrats who were caught surprised by the meteoric rise of Obama -then just went with the flow- there's a lot of shallow support out there that could evaporate as quickly as it appeared.
Barack Obama's deep-seated personality flaws and misguided decision-making are the kinds of things that political opponents tend to take notice -and full advantage- of. You can be sure that the Clintons have been soaking it all up right from the start- and have also schemed accordingly. Could explain all the aggressive early Obama's fundraising, eh- he's already looking over his shoulder.
____________________________________________________
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; clinton; fraudulenttotus; hatesamericapos; hillary; kenyanpunk; muslimterroristpos; primary; stinkinpileofpoop; worsethanbinladin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Reaganite Republican
‘smoldering ashes of hopenchange’?
Whaddyamean? It’s going swimmingly, remember what ‘HE’ said?: “No matter what some agency may say, we’ve always been and always will be a triple-A country.”
It’s all wonderful:)
2
posted on
08/13/2011 1:24:02 PM PDT
by
Beowulf9
To: Reaganite Republican
No chance for these worn-out leftist opportunists who rode into the governor’s mansion in Little Rockio on the backs of the clueless voters. We can thank a whole nation and the Republicrat Party for their gaining access to the White House the first time.
Having had a dose of Obamaism (which is much worse than a dose of clap) the nation will surely die an agonizing death if this ugly beast gains the White Hut!
3
posted on
08/13/2011 1:24:09 PM PDT
by
IbJensen
(God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made politicians.)
To: Reaganite Republican
Hillary will get the democrat nomination if she runs.
4
posted on
08/13/2011 1:33:49 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: Reaganite Republican
"...he appointed his critical -openly hostile-and recently defeated primary opponent Hillary Clinton to the head the State Department... Was it based upon her qualifications? Doubtful, considering that Shrillary had no foreign policy experience to speak of. Other presidents lacking diplomatic exposure have traditionally brought someone who themselves had such a background to the vital State Department position- alas, somehow Obama didn't feel the need." Obama hasn't seen the need to put people with talent or experience in any critical positions with the exception of Leon Panetta.
5
posted on
08/13/2011 1:49:50 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(If the government was in charge of the desert , we'd soon have a shortage of sand.)
To: Beowulf9
So you watch ABC too?
To: Reaganite Republican
7
posted on
08/13/2011 1:58:47 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Rebelbase
What can Hillary win? She has the blacks in the party to vote against her in a primary. Even if she gets the nomination the blacks will not vote for her in the election.
She a;so has much of the Obama baggage on her back. Too bad the Republicans will not have the opportunity to wipe HC in an election.
8
posted on
08/13/2011 2:03:27 PM PDT
by
2007 Crusader
(2007 Crusader)
To: Reaganite Republican
The Hopium high is wearing off quickly, and withdrawal symptoms are setting in with vomiting, diarrhea, shakes, and profuse sweating. Nurse Ratchet is standing by.
9
posted on
08/13/2011 2:05:33 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: Reaganite Republican
I don’t think she would risk being a two-time loser.
10
posted on
08/13/2011 2:10:26 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Reaganite Republican
What about the anti-cankle vote?
11
posted on
08/13/2011 2:12:49 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Rebelbase
I’m sick of the Clintons too. I want them to just go away and retire on their millions or is it billions? They are just power hungry commies.
12
posted on
08/13/2011 2:29:09 PM PDT
by
Catsrus
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Reaganite Republican
14
posted on
08/13/2011 2:37:16 PM PDT
by
sodpoodle
(Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
To: Catsrus
I think the Clintons have an immense amount of international power now (he through NPO’s, she through SOS). Power to manipulate and influence. Power that cannot be bogged down by our Republic’s processes. Power that is free of even the UN’s bureaucratic processes.
I also think Hillary is not up to a campaign, nor trying to clean up Obama’s current mess. As SOS, she’s been flitting around the world playing Queenie; only accountable to Obama. If she ran (and won), she’d have to interact and compromise with the little people.
Lastly, I know many liberals who would give her money and vote for her.
15
posted on
08/13/2011 2:42:05 PM PDT
by
freeagle
To: Catsrus
I think the Clintons have an immense amount of international power now (he through NPO’s, she through SOS). Power to manipulate and influence. Power that cannot be bogged down by our Republic’s processes. Power that is free of even the UN’s bureaucratic processes.
I also think Hillary is not up to a campaign, nor trying to clean up Obama’s current mess. As SOS, she’s been flitting around the world playing Queenie; only accountable to Obama. If she ran (and won), she’d have to interact and compromise with the little people.
Lastly, I know many liberals who would give her money and vote for her.
16
posted on
08/13/2011 2:42:19 PM PDT
by
freeagle
To: Rebelbase
Hillary will get the democrat nomination if she runs. Fully agree
Your Hope has been Redistributed. Here’s your Change!
18
posted on
08/13/2011 2:49:28 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been Redistributed. HereÂ’s your Change!)
To: SERKIT
To: Rebelbase
If Hillary got the nomination, she will get zero black votes, and she knows it.That’s why she won’t challenge the haloed one.
20
posted on
08/13/2011 3:08:31 PM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(IACTA ALEA EST!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson