IMHO...
The more solid evidence the evidence that is collected is, the better. This will serve a great purpose possibly judicially, but even more importantly, politically.
It just would cause an ugly stir if used while Obama is in the WH.
Once the next President assumes office, if evidence surfaces that Obama was not eligible, and the evidence is simple and incontrovertible, it could go a long way in complete repeal of all legislation he signed.
A legal action which put forth evidence would mostly be beneficial simply by placing the evidence into public record.
The key point politically is to make the information public; that is what will influence a future Congress to act. If all Obama legislation has the appearance of having questionable legitimacy, it would be in the interest of the future Congress to wipe the slate clean and start over. Otherwise the legislation as it has been signed by Obama would have that stigma attached to it and never gain public acceptance after the evidence is published and the legislation is seen as illegitimate - even by a sizeable number of people who support it now. If Obama’s eligibility was simply untenable in the face of new evidence after he leaves office, all of Obama’s legislation would be seen as suspect in terms of it’s legality. This would impact court interpretations as well as a general public desire to ignore it.
I wish I could agree with you. In the world I grew up in, I think everything you said was completely accurate and true. Unfortunately, I think a sizable chunk of today’s voters believe there should be no restrictions on who can be elected president of the United States. They would happily vote for a 25 year old member of Hamas, if he was charismatic and fun loving. If they knew for a fact that Obama was an illegal alien who has lied about his background from day one, it wouldn’t change a thing for them. That’s what we’re up against. It’s not just a matter of finding out what he’s hiding and proving it. It’s the “so what” attitude of the average voter. Which brings us to the argument about voter fraud. Why are the democrats fighting so hard to keep illegal aliens on the voter registration lists? Could it be because they’re the ones most likely to vote for an illegal alien?