Look out! Full revolution is on the table

PGA Weblog ^

[EdReform]

We need to get more of our military on board with Oath Keepers

[EdReform]

Ping

[matthew fuller]

"Just what did you think our military hierarchy was supposed to do about the issues you list? Are you aware of the nonpartisan nonpolitical tradition of the US military?What does the Constitution say?(You have heard of the constitution I presume.)

Seems to me that you are the ignorant weenie. "

I think that the following sworn oaths might be relevant:

The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

[wintertime]

Maybe you could post a source that outlines the Constitutional role of the military in certifying elections. I’m not familiar with that part.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What? You want me to burn down a strawman of your creation?

I am asking when did ignoring the following become part of the military code of honor and the oath to defend the Constitution?

There is real reason to believe Obama is guilty of Identity theft, multiple social security numbers, crude forgeries of critical identifying documents, and having claim to more than one citizenship. Then add this to the many other oddities in his life.

Please remember that these very highest military have a duty before God. They took an oath to defend the Constitution. They have a moral duty to the military serving under them. These men and women deserve a legitimate Commander in Chief who issues rules of engagement that are rational and is not supporting foreign factions that have sworn to kill them and American citizens.

And....There are completely peaceful and legally legitimate options open to them..(that is....if they cared more about the men and women under them, and their families, than their shiny buttons.)

Personally, I am reminded of all the people who covered up the homosexual sex abuse at Penn State. Too many are more concerned about their careers than in doing what is right. Geeze! At least those in leadership a Penn State didn't take a solemn oath.

[bayouranger]

BFLR!

[stephenjohnbanker]

B U M P

[archy]

Last night on Facebook some “progressives” who were telling me that Fox isn’t informing me about the movement and I’m clearly blind to the superiority of the progressive ideology said that there WILL be a revolution and the progressives WILL WIN.

That's what they said in Finland in 1918, too.

One Civil War and four months later, about 200 Reds were shot per day, with between 15,000-20,000 killed and thousands more fleeing to Russia or Sweden.

If those numbers seem small compared to our 224 million population, consider that in those four months in 1918, the Finns killed off about 1% of their male population; here in the USA it took us four years of our own civil war to kill off about 2%.

But even at the 1918 numbers level, you can figure out what a one or two percent among a nation with 225 million people on one side or the other would be like, and that's *only* if it lasts for four months here this time arpund.i. And so can your Facebook pals, who if they're lucky, will be on the gravedigger detail for quite a while. In Finland in 1918, only about one death in four was what we'd call a combat casualty; the rest were either dealt with in summary field executions or froxe to death in prisoner camps. Surely we can do better than that!

Oh, by the way: the rookie kids, the ones without any prior military experience, the ones who've maybe lost a family member or two to the Reds? They get to bayonet the prisoners.

[archy]

Yeah, I did write it. Everything on my blog (outside of those things noted as quotations) are my own writings.

It’s my voice in the recordings too.

Sounds to me like a feller who should be on the cwii ping list.

Well done, PA. Please keep it up.

[archy]

I don’t know how successful OWS would be in infiltrating the military, but it can be done. al-Qaeda did it with Nidal Hassan.

Ever seen what a NORTHCOM conference at Peterson AFB looks like? There are often nearly as many foreign uniforms as American ones. And NORTHCOM is tasked to Homeland Security operations....

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. Canadian Lt. Gen. J. M. Duval greets Canadian Lt. Gen. Walter Semianiw, Canada Command commander, outside the North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command headquarters Aug. 9. Semianiw visited USNORTHCOM to meet with Navy Adm. James Winnefeld, USNORTHCOM commander, and receive an overview of the command's mission and capabilities. It was his first visit to the command since assuming command of Canada Command on July 7.

(U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Thomas J. Doscher)

[dfwgator]

I don’t know how successful OWS would be in infiltrating the military, but it can be done. al-Qaeda did it with Nidal Hassan.

I picture Alec Guinness joining the Russian Army in "Dr. Zhivago."

[DTogo]

The article you referenced from The Blaze "Anti-Capitalist Teach-In Leader: 'We Have People Organizing Inside of the Military'" is based on the made-for-Youtube OWS interview conducted by I-want-another-15-minutes-of-fame anti Iraq War nutjob and friend of Code Pink Adam Kokesh.

Strange that The Blaze (and you) didn't research Kokesh before posting his interview. Kinda calls into question the veracity of the story as a whole - perhaps something Kokesh (or his Pink girlfriends?) schemed up.

The US Military siding with OWS? At ease... and drop and give F.R. 20 good ones for blog-pimping.

[Chode]

absolutely...

[Absolutely Nobama]

Yeah....this is spooky.

Here I was thinking my imagination was running wild again....

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks EdReform.