I apologize; in re-reading my response, I came off pretty harsh. I just get frustrated over the issue of whether this has been ruled on or not. It clearly has, so much so that nefarious forces have seen fit to scrub online resources for the SCOTUS cases in question.
No offense intended.
No problem. I quite agree that this issue has not been definitively ruled on or not.
Although the Wong case and others to my mind lean pretty heavily towards the jus soli side, there is still plenty of room for the court to rule in favor of jus sanguinis without actually overruling itself.
It seems, to me, that in general it’s the birther types who insist that the definition of NBC is self-evident.
No offense intended.
You shouldn't apologize. That twit has long been considered to be a troll.