Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll

OK.

I agree from reviewing the Obama senior INS records. ‘Kenya’ as a political entity, though not an independent nation, was around well before 1963. But legally it was governed under British laws.

Clearly in the Obama senior INS records he used ‘Kenya’ as the nation name a lot.

I still have found the use of ‘Kenya, East Africa’ in the LFBC released in 2011 strange. ‘East Africa’ without ‘British’ in front of it was not formal geo-political name ever from what I can tell.


23 posted on 01/25/2012 11:32:55 AM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

” ‘East Africa’ without ‘British’ in front of it was not formal geo-political name ever from what I can tell.”

Agreed, 100%.

The whole situation is bizarre.


28 posted on 01/25/2012 11:58:50 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: bluecat6

I wouldn’t put too much stock in what is on the birth certificate. I have always believed that even if it is based on original data in their 1961 file, Barack Obama Sr. was probably no where near it when it was being filled out.

I think either Stanley Ann or Madelyn Dunham filled out the information as best they could, and they might not have been knowledgeable enough or picky enough to make sure it was correct.

I very much doubt Obama Sr. paid the slightest attention to the birth of his supposed son.


49 posted on 01/25/2012 2:21:32 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson