[El Sordo]

Additional example of inconsistency.

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-10369.html

INA: ACT 349 - LOSS OF NATIONALITY BY NATIVE-BORN OR NATURALIZED CITIZEN

Sec. 349. [8 U.S.C. 1481]

(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality-

Etc.

[frog in a pot]

I have read your posts on this thread (OK, skimmed). After careful reflection, this is my conclusion:
If you were in a poker game, you would be asked to blow your cigar smoke in another direction.

If you are sincere, however, or even just playing the devil's advocate, please accept my apology and explain, at least for me, how any of what you offer diminishes the distinction in the gov language cited by Leo, between native- and natural-born.

[grey_whiskers]

Why is this inconsistent?