[frog in a pot]

Ok, thank you. I appreciate your response and concede you may be correct vis a vis usage of the term “native-born”.

But again, what bearing can any inconsistent usage of one classification have on an entirely separate classificiation of citizenship? Are you be saying that contamination of one can necessarily contaminate another separate entity?

Let me posit this for consideration: What is the distinguishing difference in the presumed governmental definitions of native- and natural born citizenship?

Thank you for any response: will get back to you later, I am running out the door.

[El Sordo]

“What is the distinguishing difference in the presumed governmental definitions of native- and natural born citizenship?”

I honestly don't know if there are any.

But that's a large part of the problem. Lack of a clear distinction on this matter.