Replies

“....you can always find an acceptable conservative candidate with the American Independent Party.”

Like a third party could be a viable alternative.

News flash.

There ain’t one.

We have to go to war with the army we have, and not the army we want. To be sure, a lot of people whom claim to be Republican, are definitely anti-conservative, and are more than willing to expedite things for their very good friends “across the aisle”. The best we can do, is to mount a primary challenge to the questionable “RINOs” and try to remove them before they become a reliable vote for the Obama agenda. Failing that, we must resort to holding their feet to the fire, making them either so uncomfortable they resign (perhaps to face legal consequences), or otherwise they become compliant to their constituents and not to some distant “money interest” that is most likely funding their campaign for office in a manner altogether at odds with the existing law.

This is going to take a LOT of grassroots organization (which already has some semblance of framework in place), a lot of disappointment (we can’t possibly remove ALL the RINOs), and considerable investment of time, effort and money on the part of the motivated.

Make sure your personal protection is up to date. The Second Amendment is there for a reason.

To make sure we may enjoy the rest of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

We have to go to war with the army we have, and not the army we want.

Usually I would agree with you, however, if there is a Progressive Liberal, AKA Mitt, leading that army, then you have a traitor to conservatism running the show.

The man is completely untrustworthy and a consummate liar.

Unworthy to lead.

I'll leave it to voters with stronger stomachs and the ability to twist themselves into pretzels in order to defend the illogic and betrayal of their own principles to vote for him.

Failing that, we must resort to holding their feet to the fire, making them either so uncomfortable they resign (perhaps to face legal consequences), or otherwise they become compliant to their constituents and not to some distant “money interest” that is most likely funding their campaign for office in a manner altogether at odds with the existing law.

You sir, are naive.

The best we can do, is to mount a primary challenge to the questionable “RINOs” and try to remove them before they become a reliable vote for the Obama agenda. Failing that, we must resort to holding their feet to the fire, making them either so uncomfortable they resign (perhaps to face legal consequences), or otherwise they become compliant to their constituents and not to some distant “money interest” that is most likely funding their campaign for office in a manner altogether at odds with the existing law.

While this is the correct approach to Seats in Congress, it is useless and futile where the Presidency is concerned.