Replies

I too wish Hannity had been a little more forceful in correcting “Jay's” erroneous claims, but he did correct “Jay” by telling him that Trayvon was 17 not 13.

What did you think about Hannity explaining that it was Zimmerman who was on the bottom being punched, it was Zimmerman who cried out for help not Martin, and that Zimmerman had a broken nose? I had to roll my eyes when “Jay” replied, “Okay” and then launched into his offer regarding the bounty.

It seemed to me that “Jay” was simply waiting for his opportunity to promote the NBPP bounty. Note that Spike Lee tweeted Zimmerman's address today - the wrong address apparently which put the unknown resident's life in danger and property at risk.

I wonder if there is a campaign to call into radio shows to promote that bounty. Obviously one call does not make a campaign, but Spike Lee's tweet of Zimmerman's address makes it clear to me that they're seeking vigilante justice.

Obama and Holder are conspicuously silent on the bounty. Wonder how they feel about it.

The caller does not care what the the facts are and never will. His community's values are no different than an Iraqi Sunni in Ramadi or a Pashtun in Kandahar. He will stand by his people no matter what the facts are. Unfortunately that is true for 90% of his community. The rule of law means nothing to someone of this mindset. He is easily lead by demagogues and believes every rumor as gospel that supports his people's position.

If they decided to root over this they may want to be very care exacting that “vigilante justice” because gun ownership is at an all time high and they may end up with more in common with Martin than just skin color.....it will not end well if they go trying to target innocent people just because they are white and the rioters are mad.