Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K
Since Mitt isn't likely to agree to any formal debate, Newt could always follow him around and "debate" Romney in absentia, as he said he'd do with Obama.

Nothing to lose, right?

11 posted on 04/12/2012 9:02:28 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel

Yes, that is exactly what he will do.

In fact, I understand a big televised debate is scheduled down in Texas just before the Texas and California primaries, and two of the three remaining republican candidates have already accepted.


14 posted on 04/12/2012 9:12:29 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Martel
Newt could always follow him around and "debate" Romney in absentia, as he said he'd do with Obama.

I doubt Newt could afford to do that at this point.

16 posted on 04/12/2012 9:22:17 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson