Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

What do you all think, is it time to take a big risk and create the perfect storm? If yes, what does it take to make this happen? The Libertarian Party convention is in early May.
1 posted on 04/16/2012 7:25:25 AM PDT by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: mongrel

As much as I like Palin and would relish her being POTUS, her chances are no better than Romney’s chances at beating Obama. I would argue that they’re significantly worse. The result would be splitting the ticket and we’d get a guaranteed 4-more years of Obama.


2 posted on 04/16/2012 7:29:53 AM PDT by trackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Can you ping the Sarah Palin ping list?


3 posted on 04/16/2012 7:30:06 AM PDT by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

You want that she should commit political suicide?


5 posted on 04/16/2012 7:32:13 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

The MSM would ignore her and she would never be heard from again.


6 posted on 04/16/2012 7:32:56 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

Absolutely guaranteed to insure Obama’s re-election.


12 posted on 04/16/2012 7:39:05 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

I think she is too smart to accept such a nomination.

I believe it would put Obama back in the White House for sure, but then I don’t believe Romney can beat Obama either.Romney is going to stink like week old crab shells when the DNC actually opens up on him.

It sure would cause a stink and perhaps open the eyes of the Republican leadership. Wait —wait.
Nothing will open their eyes. If 3 losers in a row who they picked because it was their turn doesn’t do it, nothing will

If the Republicans are lucky enough to take both houses and then pick Boehner and McConnell to run them we may as well close up shop.


13 posted on 04/16/2012 7:39:32 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
No.

On the issues of abortion, gay rights, drugs, illegal immigration, national defense and prostitution, Sarah Palin and the Libertarians are poles apart. If Palin has hopes of ever gaining national office, running as a libertarian would be the most foolish thing she could do.

14 posted on 04/16/2012 7:39:44 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

She could run... but forming a NEW party. Running as a Libertarian would not be a good idea.


15 posted on 04/16/2012 7:40:23 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
Palin is not the perfect fit for the Libertarian Party

Very true - would she join a party whose main platform plank is "smoke free dope"?

16 posted on 04/16/2012 7:41:45 AM PDT by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

I see your point, but if the Libertarian Party was okay with an ‘imperfect’ candidate they would just vote for a two-party candidate that leaned closest to their views. No. Ideological purity is their rallying cry, and why they won’t ask Palin or a Palin-like candidate to run just for the press.


17 posted on 04/16/2012 7:42:04 AM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

I’d think Newt would be a better fit to go Rogue this election. And why not the conservative party.


19 posted on 04/16/2012 7:46:51 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't go wobbly on me now Newt. You're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

The Libertarian party is for clowns and carnies.


21 posted on 04/16/2012 7:48:11 AM PDT by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

Please describe “social conservatism” and how it differs from just plain, ordinary conservatism.


24 posted on 04/16/2012 7:51:20 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

Perfect storm indeed!

“HOPE”....for America!


25 posted on 04/16/2012 7:51:38 AM PDT by petro45acp ("Don't" read 'HOPE' by L Neil Smith and Aaron Zelman...it can bring tears to eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
It would have the same effect as Ron Paul switching. Obama would win and Paul would be be in the hinterlands forever. Palin is smarter than that. The key to getting what we want is taking OVER the Republican party. We have the social conservatives, gun owners, tax cutters, and strong defense people right now. We cannot afford to do away with any group. I grew up when Republicans were nothing. They were the Rockefeller republicans, just like Romney. All they want is a tax cut. To go to a 3rd party is suicide, IMHO.

What Newt is doing is what we need to do. I will vote for him in the Texas primary. What he will do then is go to the convention and get "planks" in the party that will at least define what the "Republicans" believe in. I know many Christians fell behind Santorum to make their point, but now he's gone. Newt is the anti-Romney now. Santorum will throw his delegates behind Romney any day now, which is fine. He has no future if he looks like a sore loser. Anyone wanting to make a point now only has Newt to vote for. Stomping your feet and going home in tears isn't a game plan. To register your complaint to the Establishment Republicans, vote for Newt.

It's going to be painful to watch Romney stammer and stutter when Obama says Romney was his inspiration for Obama Care, and they bring up his votes for abortion and gay marriage, but that is reality that we face now. Conservatives voting for libertarians will just piss off the libertarians and waste a conservative vote. Reagan didn't win his first time out. Palin can return when people figure out she can do better than the others. Newt was the opportunity this go round, but again we squander our future on morons.

27 posted on 04/16/2012 7:58:36 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

So the Libertarians should ignore thier principles and nominate someone that does not share thier values? Just to play spoiler and be left holding the bag when the Candidate then switches back to thier true party after the election?

That sounds like a real good deal to me! Maybe we can nominate Hilary Clinton! We’d get the female vote and a big part of the Dem’s to vote for her!


29 posted on 04/16/2012 7:59:23 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
It would have the same effect as Ron Paul switching. Obama would win and Paul would be be in the hinterlands forever. Palin is smarter than that. The key to getting what we want is taking OVER the Republican party. We have the social conservatives, gun owners, tax cutters, and strong defense people right now. We cannot afford to do away with any group. I grew up when Republicans were nothing. They were the Rockefeller republicans, just like Romney. All they want is a tax cut. To go to a 3rd party is suicide, IMHO.

What Newt is doing is what we need to do. I will vote for him in the Texas primary. What he will do then is go to the convention and get "planks" in the party that will at least define what the "Republicans" believe in. I know many Christians fell behind Santorum to make their point, but now he's gone. Newt is the anti-Romney now. Santorum will throw his delegates behind Romney any day now, which is fine. He has no future if he looks like a sore loser. Anyone wanting to make a point now only has Newt to vote for. Stomping your feet and going home in tears isn't a game plan. To register your complaint to the Establishment Republicans, vote for Newt.

It's going to be painful to watch Romney stammer and stutter when Obama says Romney was his inspiration for Obama Care, and they bring up his votes for abortion and gay marriage, but that is reality that we face now. Conservatives voting for libertarians will just piss off the libertarians and waste a conservative vote. Reagan didn't win his first time out. Palin can return when people figure out she can do better than the others. Newt was the opportunity this go round, but again we squander our future on morons.

In the end, we will have Romney or Obama. I for one, can see the difference, even if only slight. Staying home or voting 3rd party doesn't work.

30 posted on 04/16/2012 8:00:38 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
I would appeal to Sarah Palin, Gary Johnson, and the Libertarian Party to make Sarah Palin the candidate for President at the Libertarian Party convention next month.

Sarah Palin is not a Libertarian. Sarah Palin is a Republican, --a powerful and influential Republican at that. As a powerful and influential Republican with a future in Republican politics, she will support whomever the party she belongs to nominates for president. She will be in Tampa during the convention and, rest assured, she will use her presence there to rally her followers to do the same.

And, rest assured, this place will have a melt down when the above occurs.

35 posted on 04/16/2012 8:13:10 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel
I would be greatly surprised - no, astounded - if Palin jumped over to the libertarian party.

I don't ever foresee a dominance with the libertarian party; I see them as liberals who want a balanced budget. Meanwhile, Sarah is a staunch conservative in every way and I don't see her changing that ideology.
39 posted on 04/16/2012 8:20:44 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mongrel

Palin definately has a distinct libertarian strain to her governance/ideology. But she additionally has a strong social-conservative strain, and a strong populist/reformer strain. Usually these particular elements don’t co-exist together very comfortably or very often, but with Palin it comes out in an amazingly seamless alliance. Which is one of the reasons I find her so exceptional. An ideal mix of conservatism, representing the best of every faction.


45 posted on 04/16/2012 8:29:57 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson