[Hot Tabasco]

I have no problem believing that Michelle Obama may have lost her license due to indiscretions but unless I have factual evidence that she did, I'm treating the source just like I did Dan Rather and his bogus claim of President Bush being AWOL from his ANG service.

I went to your posted Liberty.com website and found that the rhetoric he posted was taken directly from another blog (which he linked to and which also offered the disclaimer of "rumors").

And when I did a google search on "Michelle Lavaughn Robinson" I found literally tons of other blogsites echoing the very same thing but none of them providing the actual facts surrounding the loss of her license...........or Obama's for that matter.

So while it's nice to believe the worst from the first couple, I'm not offering any of this up for argument in a room full of liberals until I have ALL THE FACTS...........

[Bidimus1]

It is a shame that the CT mentality has to be combated even here.

I doubt there are any “facts” to this just a misinterpretation of leagleze.

[DiogenesLamp]

So while it's nice to believe the worst from the first couple, I'm not offering any of this up for argument in a room full of liberals until I have ALL THE FACTS...........

I agree. There is enough about them which is corrupt and shady that we don't have to make things up. We should always demonstrate proof for any accusations.

I too was disappointed at the lack of supporting evidence and left a comment in that regard.

[3D-JOY]

I remember and it has been stated and shown on this thread that it was a court ordered surrender. Is this not correct?