Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

Kev, pushing (or even nodding along to) the claim that Palin didn’t run because “she’s making so much money now”, is simply going into agreement with (or committing) vile character assassination against one our nation’s most stalwart patriots.
***bull shiite. She made a decision and this was probably part of what was involved in the decision. It’s valid. Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean it is character assassination. That’s classic hyperbole.

That particular claim smacks
***Why should I care what it smacks of? I’m a Palin supporter, and I’m real about it.

of liberal class envy and is a not-so covert invalidation
***bull shiite. It is a VALIDATION, not an Invalidation of her motivations.

of her motivations in life and the very essence of her person.
***You’re trying real hard to sound lofty, but your rhetoric is invalid. It does not invalidate the very essence of her person. Geez, get over yourself. Palin has the right to make these kinds of decisions.

After having had her laundry turned inside out for four years now, she’s been proven to be among the rarest of public servants we’ve ever seen.
***I agree. Duhh.

The woman is almost unnaturally squeaky clean, and has honestly given her very best, in a career of service to her community, her state, and her nation.
***She’s a conservative. That’s why she was targeted. She had very little backing from republicans and the republican party.

Succumb to the temptation to join in the ‘thousand cuts’ frenzy if you must,
***I have not. You, however, have succumbed to the temptation to hyperbolize.

but I won’t be there with you.
***Good, because I’m not there, in spite of your classic fallacy of straw argumentation.

Sarah may be due my criticisms for faltering when it most counted
***And yet you hyperbolize another conservative’s position when slight criticisms have been brought up.

- when the course of our country was on the line, but I won’t stoop to demeaning her for pursuing a livelihood.
***Since when is a 1-sentence statement (a truthful statement, at that) ‘demeaning’ someone. You say right here that she was pursuing a livelihood, so using your hyperbolizing and polemic approach, I should be telling you to go to hell for succumbing to the temptation to the same stuff you accuse me of doing.


92 posted on 06/28/2012 11:40:50 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

Look Kev, you’re the one who jumped aboard the enemy train and insinuated that ‘maybe Palin just enjoys the money and wealth a bit more than serving her country.’

Quit making yourself right for dumping on her like that. It’s unseemly. Retract it and move on. I know you’re a supporter.

Finis.


93 posted on 06/29/2012 12:08:57 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson