Look Kev, you’re the one who jumped aboard the enemy train
***Bull Shiite, bowl sheet, Bu//$#!t. I’m on her train and I’ll be writing in Palin in November. Your hyperbole is a form of straw argumentation.
and insinuated
***Re-read what I wrote. I NEVER insinuated. Those are simple facts about my favorite possible candidate. Your straw argumentation and exaggeration of what I write, however, are the problem here in this round of communication.
that ‘maybe Palin just enjoys the money and wealth a bit more than serving her country.’
***Did I SAY that? Let me look over what I wrote... hmmmm... nope. I did NOT say that. You can argue against stuff I DID NOT SAY all day and it will always be straw argumentation.
Quit making yourself right for dumping on her like that.
***What does this mean? When you support a ‘candidate’ that you only let other supporters say the rosey-cheeked wonderful facts but never address the other things that are obviously there? Is that what you mean? I need you to acknowledge that because my argumentation is against that, and I don’t want it to be straw argumentation like all the bullcrap you’ve been putting out in this thread.
It’s unseemly. Retract it and move on.
***No.
I know you’re a supporter.
***Then I’ll support our non-candidate the way I see fit, and you can support her the way you see fit. Are you going to writer her in come November?
Finis.
***Only if you can let it be finis. It would be a real treat to see a finis to the classic fallacies you’ve been exhibiting.
Kev, you started this, and you’re doing a really poor job of finishing it.
I objected to your (possibly unintentional) slander of Sarah Palin, and instead of simply withdrawing that comment, you’ve now got your back up about it.
You can continue making yourself right about it for as long as you want, but that won’t change my objection.
This behavior is what rubbed so many people wrong on the LENR threads. And to think, I had your back on those.