Loren is saying Gilbert didn't cite any sources for that claim. He didn't. That's a fact.
As I said. You are lame. The reference is well known.
You are purposely being “anal” here.
LorenC wants to mislead with his “no evidence statement.” The evidence is already public.
Big deal, Gilbert doesn’t reference the article. It’s already public knowledge. LorenC is the one lying to people in this case.