Breaking: 1940 Census Shows Obama Alias Harrison Bounel Born 1890; Ties To Connecticut

BirtherReport.com ^ | January 19, 2013 | Unattributed/Orly Taitz

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Thanks for the Pings.

[Brown Deer]

maybe it was a mod?

[Brown Deer]

Home of the Whopper
Over 042-68-4425 Served

[PLMerite]

Are there any documents with this “stolen” SSN that can be proven to have existed prior to his candidacy?

Eliminate the wild gooses before engaging Warp Drive.

[Brown Deer]

The SS created a dummy SSN for a teenager living in HI in 1977. Really?

Maybe that's when he first got protection, since he was telling everyone in Hawaii that he was going to be president. ;-)

[Brown Deer]

http://www.barackobama.com/tax-returns/

[Brown Deer]

Somerville Police Department - Home
Hacked By: Rexwom

[Brown Deer]

Google cache: Somerville Police Department - Home

[PA-RIVER]

The number has been connected to his selective service. At one time you could access his Selective service verification with this number. Definitely the number he’s stolen.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[little jeremiah]

I would like to see his actual parentage addressed, and the original name he was born with, and what child was actually given the name BHO at birth.

Not diminishing in any way Sven’s info. It’s just not the entire picture. It all needs to be made public somehow or another.

[wintertime]

I can’t read these any more. It breaks my heart.

[M Kehoe]

Good morning.

To answer your questions in post 20 from yesterday...

If there is a court action, a private investigator can obtain various reports that reveal copious amounts of information. The SSN, court actions, addresses, relatives, friends, and much, much more. All legal.

Do a search on Lexis/Nexis, specifically the "Accurint Comprehensive," report.

5.56mm

[PLMerite]

SSNs have been obliterated. Anything released after he was a candidate is worthless as it’s been filtered through the Secret Service. You’d have to come up with some first-generation form he filled out prior to 2007 to be sure.

[GBA]

Before the change, you only applied for a SS# when you needed one for your first job. I got mine around age 13-14.

My memory about that is fuzzy, but that's about how I remember it. I think I got mine about the same age so I could have a paper route.

I was adopted shortly after and I remember having to go back to the court house for something to do with SS, I think it was to get a new SSN, IIRC.

[PA-RIVER]

You are wrong. Way too many records tied to Obama with this number. House, SSN, SS, Taxes, many in data bases going back many years, multiple records. He didn’t have a valid BC, so he bought used SSN. It’s that simple. It’s why he refused to produce a BC for so long.

[MMaschin]

I agree.

I originally supported Dr Taitz, both financially, and through online comments. It wasn't until I actually saw her in the Georgia courtroom that I realized the only explanation for her actions was that she is acting to INTENTIONALLY obfuscate the truth! That is the only explanation to her actions.

Everything that Dr Taitz has done to this point has had the effect of either 1) forming the narrative the 'Birthers' are crazy, or 2) advancing the idea that 'Birthers' beliefs have been dismissed repeatedly by the courts.

Dr Taitz IS working in support of President Obama! There is not other logical explanation.

[x]

So they were protecting him back in 1986? That's quite a conspiracy theory!

If you've got a hard copy of the actual court records from the 1980s or so, you could have a point. Otherwise, isn't it possible that what you can get online may have been altered when Obama began his campaign?

Does the Secret Service take measures to protect the information of Presidents and candidates? I don't know, but it's something someone should look into. Is it really crazier than some of the other theories?

BTW, what's with the "possible high risk"?