Posted on 01/26/2013 8:12:16 AM PST by darkwing104
In the throes of her faux outrage Secretary of State Hillary Clintons made this phrase famous. She uttered it while being questioned about the lies this administration told after four Americans were killed in Benghazi. She acted like a child who was caught in a lie trying to find a way out of any consequences. Whether she realizes it or not, this will register with the low information voter and thus will become her legacy. If you dont think of this being her legacy what is the first thing you think when someone mentions her husband Bill?
Why does it matter?
During the months leading up to the murders at Benghazi, Chris Stevens, and the Ambassador in Libya were begging for the increased security that was denied by all levels of the State Department and no one was held responsible. The White House pressured Tweeter to pull the Libyan embassy tweets during the murder spree and forced CNN to surrender the Ambassadors diary they found at Benghazi murder scene. Hillarys minions hid the survivors of Benghazi from the public and Congress. They denied the existence of any real-time audio and video feed from the compound. This White House ordered military commanders to stand down from launching a rescue mission. The administration blamed a video when the world knew that a YouTube Video had nothing to do with the pre-planned attack. Now she is lying to Congress when she said she always said that it was a terrorist attack. But why should that matter?
Why does it matter?
With no fear of retribution from America, al Qaeda forces raided a natural gas plant in Algeria to capture Westerners and most likely was planning to take them to Libya before the Algerian security forces could react to their presence.
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
It makes a HUGE difference in that there are only four, not necessarily mutually exclusive, conclusions one can draw from the facts:
1.) The State Department and the Secretary of State deliberately mislead the nation
2.) The State Department and the Secretary of State recklessly promoted an incorrect interpretation of the facts.
3.) The State Department and the Secretary of State are incompetent and heads should roll.
4.) The State Department and the Secretary of State are engaged in a very deep diplomatic game, which does not rule out 1, 2, or 3, and almost certainly means they are in over their heads and are trying to get out of a situation they never should have gotten into.
Which ones apply, Madame Secretary?
It makes a HUGE difference in that there are only four, not necessarily mutually exclusive, conclusions one can draw from the facts:
1.) The State Department and the Secretary of State deliberately mislead the nation
2.) The State Department and the Secretary of State recklessly promoted an incorrect interpretation of the facts.
3.) The State Department and the Secretary of State are incompetent and heads should roll.
4.) The State Department and the Secretary of State are engaged in a very deep diplomatic game, which does not rule out 1, 2, or 3, and almost certainly means they are in over their heads and are trying to get out of a situation they never should have gotten into.
Which ones apply, Madame Secretary?
“What difference does it make if I was incompetent or corrupt?”
“What difference does it make? They’re all dead.”
The words I remember from Clintbilly are:
“I did not have sex with that woman!”
And:
“It depends what the meaning of is is.”
The US should release the Blind Sheik...’s body.
If you’re going to make sure something never happens again (as Shrillary vowed), then wouldn’t part of the process be finding out why it occurred in the first place?
In the Clinton bizarro world, I guess not.
She’s pretty old to still be this stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.