Who cares if you are surprised? This not about you. This is about the topic of the thread and its author’s efforts to promote Creationism as the author sees it by holding evolutionary science up to ridicule upon the basis of the author’s comments about the dinosaur tissue.
If you want to be surprised, have at it. If you want to talk about the inability or ability of dinosaur tissue to survive in the observed condition for 65 or more million years, the let’s hear it.
Mary H. Schweitzer, the scientist behind this, has no problems believing it is millions of years old - she is just interested in how well preserved it is in that one can detect cellular structure and even some reactivity (antibody binding IIRC) to heme and collagen.
Well the author said he found it mind boggling and I agreed it was surprising. If the author includes such a response within the article then my agreement with the author is indeed in line with the article. Believe me, I’m not the one that dragged the conversation off topic.