Posted on 05/15/2013 3:59:44 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
43. Investigators requested an independent review of our findings in respect to the long-form birth certificate image that fell within his field of expertise.
44. Upon the conclusion of our expert’s examination he issued an independent 40 page forensic report in which he verified our investigational finding and validating conclusion in full agreement with the finds of investigators. He concluded:
• “…based on my observations and findings, it is clear that Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured documented created by utilizing material from various sources.” and
• “In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated.”
Authenticity of White House Released Birth Certificate Image
45. Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27, 2011 by the White House, and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate, is not a scan of an original hard copy document. It is, in fact, an undeniable computer generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by commission of felonious fraudulent acts.
46. Sheriff Arpaio’s investigators have determined the document ( the .pdf file released by the White House) was created entirely by human intervention, and not by the actions of random computerization. As such, the White house computer image cannot be relied upon as bona fide factual record of the birth event that it attempts to depict. [...]
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Lt. Mike Zullo reveals the report on the pdf forgery by the independent forensic digital document examiner in an affidavit in the AL case.
Nice try but Jay Cornball, Hussein’s press-slut says it’s real. And that should be good enough for us!!! Sarcasm off
We all know this. So what?
The timing may be key. This report coincides with an outbreak of WH scandals & the slow but steady erosion of Obama’s poll #s. What may have been a ‘so what’ 2 or 3 mos ago might get traction now.
Part of the reason powerful special interests pooled their resources to put Obama in the WH was to get certain results. The less effective Obama is at achieving those goals, the more dissatisfied even his supporters become. Sooner or later the tipping point is reached.
" it is clear that Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured documented created by utilizing material from various sources.”
That thing was created out of whole cloth. Now why would that need to be, unless they didn't even have ANY original 1961 HDOH document to start with?
Indeed. Now that more eyes have been opened to the corrupt liar known as BHS, more people may be willing to consider the possibility that the BC isn’t on the up-and-up.
When do we find out who manufactured Obama?
Many thanks seizethecarp!
Crossposting from other thread; many thanks GregNH for posting this!
http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.doc
To: Fred Nerks; Brown Deer; David; Spunky; LucyT
Clicking on this link will download a Word document that is 57 pages and 5.5MG Zullo Affidavit for AL Supreme Court case number 1120465
Here are some [snips]:
34. I visited Hawaii twice and continued our investigation. After further in-depth computerized testing and discovering additional information,we concluded in mid-2012 that Mr. Obama’s identity documents were not only forged beyond the legal standard of probable cause,but due to loop holes in the state of Hawaii’s vital statistics reporting laws,there was the distinct evidence suggesting that Hawaii’s statutes appeared to be in conflict with federal immigration law and posed an independent threat to the national security of the United States.
45. Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27,2011 by the White House,and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate,is not a scan of an original hard copy document. It is,in fact,an undeniable computer generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by commission of felonious fraudulent acts.
53. As such,this computer manipulated fraudulent image cannot be deemed as acceptable legal evidence for the purpose of validation or verification of identity or citizenship,or serve as verification of a birth event by any Secretary of State in the confines of the United States.
54.Mr. Obama has not released any evidence other than a manufactured computer forgery by human intervention and design in an effort to support his claim of his birth taking place at Kapiolani Hospital,Honolulu,Hawaii on August 4,1961.
58. Investigators have also determined that the much touted 1961 newspaper announcements are in fact utterly unreliable as evidence to support verification of the event as depicted in the .pdf image of the manufactured birth certificate released by the White House and attested to my Mr. Obama. In addition the aforementioned announcements can be of no substitute for a Hawaii State Official Birth Certification and or Certificate.
153. Investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio that several possible crimes may have been committed: 154. First,the fraudulent creation of an official document. 155. Second,the White House characterizing a forgery as an officially-produced governmental birth record; and 156. Third,Mr. Obama represented to the residents of Maricopa County and the American public that a forgery was “proof positive” of his authentic 1961 Hawaiian long-form birth certificate, thereby deceiving voters and state election commissions across the country into believing he was eligible to become President,have his name appear on Presidential ballots,thereby garnering votes from the public under false pretenses.
163. Investigators concluded that this representation of “80” that appears on Mr. Obama’s selective service card is in fact an altered 2008 pica date stamp. 164. Investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio that several possible crimes may have been committed:
170. We discovered that data records for the entire week of August 2,1961 through August 7, 1961,were completely missing from the microfilm roll. This included the alleged date of Mr. Obama’s birth (August 4,1961).
209. Record not released including the follow: A. Original,long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate. B. Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) C. Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) D. Obama’s adoption records E. Records of Obama’s and his mother’s repatriation as US citizens on return from return from Indonesia F. Obama’s baptism records G. Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) H. Punahou School financial aid or school records I. Occidental College financial aid records J. Harvard Law School records K. Columbia senior thesis L. Columbia College records M. Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association N. Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator O. Obama’s law client list P. Obama’s medical records Q. Obama’s passport records
It is pretty comprehensive to say the least.
1,407 posted on Wed May 15 2013 11:21:14 GMT-0500 (CDT) by GregNH (If you can’t fight, please find a good place to hide!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1405 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
There’s very little Fantasy in what you’ve written.
Valery Jarret runs the WH. She’s the one who nixed the rescues. She is the power behind the puppet. And when the puppet starts to get too raggedy, and his threads begin to unravel, things will go down hill for him.
He isn’t smart enough to know that he’s nothing more than a stooge.
On another note, I wonder how much Jarret has to say about holder, because in my opinion, right now I think he’s increasingly seen to be more of a loose cannon than they want or need.
I’ve always said, the kenyan’s demise will come from the hand of his own “peeps.”
Even Chuckie Wrangle is bailing on him.
For a guy who has written 2 books about himself Obama is not an open book
Zullo destroys John Woodman’s book so loved by Fogblowers and certain Obots on FR:
22. During that meeting, all aspects of the document were examined with the intention of attempting to disprove the allegation that the document had been fabricated. This included a review of the work of an author by the name of John Woodman. John Woodman, a struggling, self-described computer expert, had authored a book putting forth explanations on how computer software automatically caused the anomalies contained in the White House document. Mr. Woodman’s work had been cited vigorously by numerous media outlets attempting to disqualify allegations suggesting that the .pdf document offered by Mr. Obama was anything but authentic.
23. The theories set forth in Mr. Woodman’s book were thoroughly tested by investigators and found to be nothing more than pure speculation and supposition. The investigators concluded Mr. Woodman’s work was nothing more than conjecture without any evidentiary proof that his theories could be supported.
24. When investigators put his theories into practical application, they could not successfully reproduce any of the anomalies found in the White House document by automated computerized process. Therefore Mr. Woodman’s work was dismissed as irrelevant and offering zero evidentiary value.
34. I visited Hawaii twice and continued our investigation. After further in-depth computerized testing and discovering additional information, we concluded in mid-2012 that Mr. Obama’s identity documents were not only forged beyond the legal standard of probable cause, but due to loop holes in the state of Hawaii’s vital statistics reporting laws, there was the distinct evidence suggesting that Hawaii’s statutes appeared to be in conflict with federal immigration law and posed an independent threat to the national security of the United States.
“We all know this. So what?”
Yeah, kinda what I’m thinking. On another thread discussing Ted Cruz’s eligibility to be president many have stated that if one parent is a US citizen the new born is considered a natural born citizen whether born in the US or not. If this is correct for Cruz then being that Obama’s mother was a US citizen when he was born then isn’t he a natural born citizen, same as Cruz? Btw, not a Obama fan, just trying to sort this out....
Be kinda nice if we didn't sidetrack this thread. It's specifically about Obama's birth certificate forgery, not his eligibility.
That's a separate issue that can easily overwhelm all of the important findings in this release, if we start that conversation here.
These findings appear to have been entered as evidence in the ongoing federal case in Alabama, which makes this a very important development. It's big enough to be the next 'shoe to drop' in the exploding Obama scandals, if played right.
Obama’s mother wasn’t old enough to confer US citizenship if her child was born on foreign soil. If he wasn’t born on US soil then he had to naturalize just to become a US citizen at all. A possible loophole to that could be if she was single when he was born, but I’m not sure about that
At this point the crimes committed to cover up Obama’s lack of documentation are what should land him not only out of the White House but in jail for a very, very long time. If he naturalized and is thus a US citizen now, what he has done is treason, and the Constitutional remedy is the death penalty.
“We all know this. So what?”
For the first timed a COURT CERTIFIED forensic document examiner who has met the extremely high standartd (Daubert Standard) as a federal expert witness has produced a report that, unless successfully challenged meets the Federal Rules of Evidence if a court orders a discovery hearing on the authenticity of the White House pdf:
“42. Taking it a step further, investigators sought an independent authority on forensic document examination that had no previous connection with our inquiry. Investigators commissioned a court certified handwriting analyst and forensic document examiner with over 20 years of experience providing document expertise to legal and law enforcement communities, corporations, financial institutions and private individuals for this task.”
IANAL, but I had to become familiar with the “Daubert standard” that my expert witnesses would be subjected to being challenged on during my jury trail for custody of my son. Here are the key points that came out of the SCOTUS Daubert case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard
“The Daubert standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses’ testimony during United States federal legal proceedings.”
“In 2011, Rule 702 was again amended to make the language clearer. The rule now reads:
RULE 702. TESTIMONY BY EXPERT WITNESSES
“A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:
(a) The expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
(b) The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;
(c) The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and
(d) The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.