Are You a Target of the Susnuts?

Pascal Fervor ^ | 9 Sept 2013 | Pascal

[Avoiding_Sulla]

Or are you one of their mindless bots who believes you are somehow special?

At Liberty's Torch, Weetabix asked me a question whose answer is too long to put into a small comment.

Pascal - I must admit up front that a surfeit of current projects has undermined my normal willingness to research - have you any links to further explain the "Malthusian Sustainability nuts?" 

The answer is even too long for a single post, but I need try at least this once.

For my recent thoughts, the Sustainability label at my blog will provide you many examples of news that spurred me to note the connection.

Our host, Fran, beginning in 2004, ran an exhaustive series called "The Death Cults."  The participation of mainstream elected leaders were much less brazen then. But they did permit non-profit status to be bestowed upon a load of Malthusian extremists. The same IRS that blocked TEA Party groups from (c4) status lets those guys thrive under (c3).

I've a not too complex theory that has withstood my tests over time. It is time to let others take some shots at it. If it only needs some adaptations and it can be refined, maybe there is hope that can be snatched from the knowledge. Know thy enemy and know thyself, and you will win every war said Sun Tsu.

Thomas Malthus' theories arose about 50 years after Pascal's death. The Age of Reason was beginning to undermine the Ancien Régimes. Many rulers saw and welcomed the benefits of liberty. But two kinds, both powerful, hated it. Those who hate the common man, and those who love concentrated power. Sometimes they're the same, and sometimes not. Malthus provided a "moral" cloak to hide both the explicit and implicit hatred of humanity -- even from themselves. By being able to convince even themselves that their vision is righteous, they can remain calm and seemingly benign as they convince large numbers

"Leave it to us boys. We know what needs be done. Really."

(The ancient Sophists understood power and how to get and keep it. One of their chief ways of keeping it was through fostering ideas that attract casuists -- men who sought the moral path based on studying cases of conduct -- and let them do the heavy lifting, often with little expense or risk to the Sophists' masters, spurred by a few demagogues, and fueled considerably by the zeal of the useful idiots. Eric Hoffer, by popularizing the more easily understood term of "true believer,"  did us a disservice by disconnecting the Greek designation for them, and thus their historically implied connection to the power seeking schemers. The humanity haters may believe they now have sufficient armies of those who are enthralled by the indirect means  to achieving a new (old) religion (see below). It is one that will provide them moral authority to achieve their goals. They only have to support them when things get tough. Mostly they are silent partners.) 

A tactical note. What I'd like to make popular is the term Susnuts (or something like it), for the worshipers of Sustainability. (It really does fit the open ones. What I'd like is for the term to affect those who remain hidden. Some, who retain some of their humanity, will feel tainted by it). They believe their goal is righteous: to save us all from the one thing the planet has too much of -- human beings. They know that targets will not appreciate it, so they can't easily announce it. But they could not help leaving mountains of evidence as they progress.

It has all the earmarks of a religion. Ancient pagan ones. The ones that threw live babies in holocausts and virgins to the wolves. Its "priests" are instigating wars with the competition -- all people who still adhere to the Judeo-Christian ethos whether or not they are religious. For instance, you are seeing today with the witch hunts to rid the military of people who dare stand by their religion. Any religion that has in its books the promise "God will provide" -- the contrary idea to their conviction that we will run out of sustainable items -- is anathema to them. The phrase linked to Hitler "the Jewish disease" was a foundational concept of the earliest Susnuts long before Hitler was born.

One more thing. The old labels do not apply here. Even those who call themselves religious or conservative will say "but there are too many people." They might be reachable. If even 50% reading this blog don't say that, then that would be wonderful news. But, if Armageddon really is imminent, forget about large numbers. Then, as Revelation predicts, the majority are already deluded. What can I say? The ones who seek to save their souls will be reached.

I say that as an agnostic. I literally do not know. But the evidence is hard to deny. Believing the world is overpopulated has to be deluded, because it leads inevitably to world-wide wipe-outs. This goes back to "Progressive" thought of the late 1800s. Those who most want children cannot be tolerated by the Progs lest they over-populate with all "the wrong" types. HG Wells' eugenic euphemism of "people of the abyss" is what they do not want as survivors.

If we are stoked into a civil war, it will be between peoples who have been set upon each other by these schemers seeking to obliterate the current population of the planet. I used the term 1/13 as a guess for their target number, because it fits their vision so well. Only Aces will be permitted to survive. Ace rocket scientists down to ace housekeepers and gardeners I guess.  Don't ask me how they plan on living well if they do manage somehow to survive their man-made cataclysm. They're the whiz-kids. Ask them.

Blessed are the peacemakers has a whole different meaning to me today than it did when I was a young and more foolish man. May God forgive us all.

[Avoiding_Sulla]

As government becomes more tyrannical, what was once a subject that was rarely discussed -- Sustainability extremists having so much influence on public policy -- has been turning up more and more.

Ideas that were once the theme of nightmares and horror stories keep turning into reality. There are no subjects, no behaviors that are ruled abnormal. And there is some Gub approved PC squad that will jump down your throat if you dare utter such words as nutjob to any one in their brand of nutjobs they claim to be protecting from offense.

Are all people in power nuts? Then how come they are so successful?

If only some are openly nuts, who is protecting them and how do they keep their sanity and the multiple deranged operations going? What thoughts keep them on track?

This blog post offers up a theory designed to help understand what may be the nature of your enemy by contemplating behavior that is rarely discussed.

There is much behavioral evidence to support this theory. If it is close to helping you understand the nature of those who hate Judeo-Christian morality, and Sun Tsu was correct, then you might finally begin to wins some battles, both cultural and governmental.

For me, anything that might help pull the West out of its death spiral is worth considering.

[GraceG]

My message to the Malthusian control freaks!!!

We will colonize the solar system then we will colonize the rest of the damned galaxy and the Malthusians BE DAMNED!

We are the only tool using intelligence that we know so far that can colonize space. We owe it to either God or the Universe itself to shift the paradigm of life to a space faring civilization. Last time I checked the Dolphins haven't even invented the wheel yet.

[GraceG]

I say that as an agnostic. I literally do not know. But the evidence is hard to deny. Believing the world is overpopulated has to be deluded, because it leads inevitably to world-wide wipe-outs. This goes back to “Progressive” thought of the late 1800s. Those who most want children cannot be tolerated by the Progs lest they over-populate with all “the wrong” types. HG Wells’ eugenic euphemism of “people of the abyss” is what they do not want as survivors.

They are such control freaks aren’t they, this points to a generous insecurity on their part where they don’t trust even themselves to make the right decisions so they project that upon others in that they will never trust the “masses” to make their own decisions and thus is the sickness that is progressive-ism.

[Avoiding_Sulla]

Nice Torus! Where’s the description of what’s going on there?

[Avoiding_Sulla]

It has been a long while since I last pinged this Death Cultivation list. I pray you are all well.

This post offers up a theory to help us better comprehend leaders who seem nutty, but whose success must prove they are pretty shrewd. We run a risk of never winning back America by presuming there are only creeps and nuts there.

[octex]

I read the comments here through #5.

I felt like I’d fallen into an alternate universe.

Really strange stuff, but to each their own.

[DLfromthedesert]

Agenda 21 is part of this scheme

[Avoiding_Sulla]

I agree. It being UN originated points to how global are the goals.

However, that’s an older bit of evidence that supports this theory. Today there was this story: “Pope Francis reaches out to atheists and agnostics”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/10302850/Pope-Francis-reaches-out-to-atheists-and-agnostics.html

Excerpt: “The Pope has struck a surprisingly conciliatory tone towards atheists and agnostics, saying that God will “forgive” them as long as they behave morally and live according to their consciences.”

Live according to your conscience. What a godsend (lower case) to those whose morality is not “live and let live,” but “do whatever it takes to protect Sustainability.”

See? That’s a moral code too, and those who believe it to be righteous are living “according to their consciences.”

I’d love to ask Pope Francis “Whatever happened to ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you?’ but I fear I know his answer. If there any institution that is not overrun by new age influences, I’d like to support it.