Posted on 03/02/2014 7:12:19 AM PST by marktwain
Girl Scouts at Gun Show |
A pro-abortion organization does not belong at a gun show.
correction. i just posted this on GS FB page.
No girl scout cookies here, planned parenthood, lesbian agenda and all. The same cookies are available at Wal Mart or just about any dollar store for a fraction of the cost and proceeds don’t go for above mentioned lefties
I don’t care where they are. They can keep their abortion support cookies.
“Id rather NOT be ruled at all.”
We are not “ subjects “ we are citizens of a free country , if we are willing to defend it
If you were represented by the first 100 people in the door at the Yuma Gun Show you’d likely be better off and not ruled over at all.
WADR, rethink that statement. Their job is to SERVE us, not to RULE us! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!
You've been lied to, which doesn't surprise me since we're talking liberals and homosexuals running the GSA.
Everything has a price. While the .22 ammo might be free there may a cost attached to it I wouldn’t want to pay. I’ve seen no solid proof that the box of Thin Mints is paying for abortions but I could offset that contribution somewhere else. That’s the hidden cost of Thin Mints and while barely worth it, I must have Thin Mints. Don’t judge me, you have your problems too.
I didn't mean to imply that you did. That was a rhetorical question intended for discussion.
You didn't buy cookies and mentioned to the leader the nature of your objection and otherwise left it for the girls to enjoy themselves. I think that is the best approach given the circumstances and basically the approach I have followed when approached with cookie solicitations.
I’m sure the RINO leadership would say it is not “prudent” to have a more honest congress with core values, because they are neither beholden to multinational corporations nor would they be internationalist enough.
They might do “radical” things, like trying to restore the government to constitutionality and balanced budgets, significantly downgrading the US intelligence-police complex, block the importation of semi-illegal laborers, and even erect tariffs to bring industry back to the US.
The Republican leadership would be horrified.
Good catch. I'd go one further and say that I refuse to be 'ruled'.
Those who attend gun shows are very responsible and polite people...
Not only that but those who attend gun shows have disposable income and are generous. Our German shepherd rescue had a booth at the Crossroads of the West show at OC Fairgrounds in January and did more in donations and merchandise than any other show.
We will be back on March 15-16.
http://www.gsroc.org/2013/events.gsr
Don’t these Girl Scouts have to wear a uniform or have they gotten rid of it because it is, well, uniform?
Frankly it doesn't matter to me how the $$ breaks down; it's the philosophy of the leadership victimizing its membership...children...little girls...
When homosexuals hide behind little girls and boys I call them out on it, not support it because there are children involved.
Were the scouts on their way to a planned parenthood meeting?
When it comes down to actually enacting that phrase into action it's surprising how many Freepers are opposed.
First, Ms. Sanger is correct. Even the most cursory objective review of the evidence supports a link between genetics - individual and racial - and what are generally considered serious social ills - crime, dependency, drug use, low intelligence, destructive voting patterns and family breakdown.
Second, there is clear evidence as well that the family and community milieu in which a child is raised will also affect these measures, and that the combination of “nature” and “nurture” are strongly additive, and that BOTH are passed down generationally.
People from both sides of the abortion debate and related debates may rage against the validity and significance of the evidence I refer to above, but I'd suggest they are not thinking impartially, and need to go back and review it again.
Ms. Sanger has proposed and put into place a mechanism for selectively “culling the herd,” and has done so with the stated purpose of improving the herd's vital qualities over succeeding generations. An understanding of animal breeding, coupled with a broad societal view of the problem, suggests that the wisdom of her method has probably gone some distance towards its goal: although things have gone markedly downhill anyway, one might hate to imagine the society that we would now live in if THESE specific millions of offspring had been allowed to join the herd since Roe v Wade.
It is not to be overlooked, in a society that says it values freedom, that Ms. Sanger's mechanism employs a form of selective breeding that is engaged in voluntarily, not compulsorily, by the mother. From the standpoint of Ms. Sanger's detractors, it is also not to be overlooked that the developing child is not a voluntary participant - and there's the rub.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.