Not buying the points contained in the article.
And no witness would come forward?
Maybe none saw the event or didn’t see what is claimed.
And the part about a sympathetic jury to the prosecution ?
Uhmmm “ Voir dire”???
I’ll skip the rest.
Sumpn ain’t right.
So he was pointing a camera at people that didn’t have tape in it? Something ain’t right indeed.
Unless the police “lost” the evidence, that they said didn’t exist in the first place...