Can’t be “fair use” since the topic of the “news” story wasn’t an analysis of the purloined YouTube clip. It’s clearly just blatant theft. Should send them a bill for the licensing of the copyright content they already agreed to use. Name your price.
I key my YouTube stuff, usually with some motion effects to hopefully not make it worth stealing. What little I put up usually is also sent to stock agencies. YouTube stuff is also rendered in a lower resolution.
I key my YouTube stuff, usually with some motion effects to hopefully not make it worth stealing. What little I put up usually is also sent to stock agencies. YouTube stuff is also rendered in a lower resolution.
Interesting that they deliberately cropped out his watermarks. That’s pretty blatant.