Skip to comments.Still Debunking the Benghazi Debunkers
Posted on 12/02/2014 9:03:57 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Reliable sources: None of the Republicans on the committee agreed with these findings, or were even given adequate time to review them
The Washington Post, like The New York Times, is intent on declaring the Benghazi scandal dead and buried, as suggested in this recent cartoon, and in this more recent editorial. The latest item these papers are hoping will provide the final stamp on the story is a recent report issued by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
In December of last year, David Kirkpatrick of The New York Times fallaciously cast doubt on the idea that al Qaeda perpetrated the 2012 Benghazi, Libya attacks. Similarly, the Posts latest Benghazi editorial, published on November 29th, piles absurdity upon absurdity. The authors acknowledge that The [House Intel Committee] confirms that diplomatic security at the Benghazi mission was ill-prepared and that the agents knew they could not defend the compound from an attack. The panel also criticizes the CIAs flawed handling of talking points that contributed to possibly incorrect statements Sept. 16, 2012, by Susan Rice, then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
The American Press is paid by the Democrats. They will write anything to protect their paychecks.
BENGHAZI can destroy not only Obama, but the entire Democrat Party. Of course the American Press will downplay it.
Why did Hillary and Obama help to overthrow the government of Libya?
Where did Qadaffi’s gold go to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.