A man will be at a disadvantage in any debate, simply because if he loses, "She kicked his butt!" and if he wins, he is a Meanie! ("Did you see how that A**hole treated that nice lady").
Guys, if you ever argued with a woman, you know what I am talking about.
The only person who can mop the floor with Fauxcahontas or Cankles and not be portrayed as a male chauvanist pig is....a woman.
Imho, Sarah can handle either and come out on top.
If she does well that will likely shift a chunk of the woman's vote to her. Otherwise, gender solidarity will prevail surely as racial solidarity and white guilt carried the king of the FSA into power.
You are absolutely right! I believe that is why Palin is seriously thinking about running. Either Clinton or Warren will be the Dem nominee. The men in the GOP won’t have the stomach to fight those two women. Sarah Palin will. As she has shown time and again, she is fearless in standing up to, well quite frankly, everyone.
Good point. She's also got a huge advantage in dealing with the Mean Girls of the MSM. Remember when Katie "Pinhead" Couric chided H.W. Bush -- a distinguished WWII Vet old enough to be her father -- as if he was a child, for his support of tobacco growers? Being a gentleman, he had to sit there and take it, as ANY man would. Couric played dirty pool and took advantage of HW's good manners.
But a woman ... Palin would slay the Mean Girls of the MSM on a lot of levels: she's smarter, she's better informed, she's prettier to look at than most and every bit as gorgeous as the best of them.
And when it comes to dealing with Putin -- I believe Palin's advantages in that arena would be so incredible that she'd make him impotent in front of the world, and he'd enjoy it!!!