Judicial Watch is a fine, conservative watchdog for freedom, but even though it's found that Hillary!/Huma are guilty as charged, will it really change the minds of any of her loyal brown shirts?
1 posted on
06/20/2015 8:23:41 AM PDT by
PROCON
To: PROCON
Hillary’s carpet needs cleaning?
2 posted on
06/20/2015 8:26:03 AM PDT by
laweeks
To: PROCON
It won’t make a difference. Her thighness just walks through the sh.t storm of allegations with the shield of a combined worthless press and her faithful minions.
3 posted on
06/20/2015 8:28:10 AM PDT by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: PROCON
I’m all for closing the barn door but it needs to be done before all the horses, cows, pigs, sheep, goats, and chickens get out.
4 posted on
06/20/2015 8:29:27 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: PROCON
However, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan declined for now to address claims from Judicial Watch that Clinton's use of the private account and server led State Department officials to commit a fraud on the court by certifying they had turned over all responsive records. Like lying in the face of a federal judge is a big deal to the Clintons...
Maybe we can start calling him U.S. District Court Judge Emmet "Susan Webber Wright" Sullivan...
8 posted on
06/20/2015 8:44:10 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
To: PROCON
no, but I’ll bump this anyway in case everyone’s bored with the flagpocalypse.
13 posted on
06/24/2015 4:45:30 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: PROCON
Either the judge is on the take and this is to show she’s above board or his family is well insured.
16 posted on
06/25/2015 8:17:07 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson