[atc23]

There is no 47%, that is why Romney, nor you, nor anyone, could ever define it. McCain and Romney aren’t running, and black turnout, all democrat turn out, was much lower in 2012, because everyone is tired of Obama, only the pro-choice ad running Mitt Romney, could have lost that election. No one wants to elect the second black in a row, the wife of Obama, who has never even held office, and who would be a terrible campaigner to the general public. She would greatly depress the democrat vote, and increase republican turnout to great levels. It would be a huge landslide against her.

Keep telling yourself that - I hope it makes you feel better - by next year at this time, Obama's policies will have swelled the 47% to 51% and Marxist/Leninist candidates will win handily.

"Increase republican turnout" (?) With who as the standard bearer? With whom to overcome the votes of the entitlements class? -

The fundamental transformation that Obama promised, it happened despite two midterm wipeouts for him and his party. If the Obama voters can turn out in the midterms like they turn out for general elections . . . they got it made in the shade FRiend

[ansel12]

I notice that you couldn’t define who the 47% was, that’s OK, neither could the idiot who made it up.

I hope it makes you feel better to avoid actually thinking about about the 2016 election.

[Conservinator]

BHO’s agenda has happened because the spineless, unmanned Repubics have committed treason by not defending the constitution. I am afraid the only answer now will have to be “discussed” in the streets.