[marktwain]

We live in dangerous times, but no more so than 1774, 1811, 1853, 1860, or 1927.

We can overcome this.

[kevslisababy]

Thanks, I needed that!

[P8riot]

Then there is the perspective that the decision on gay marriage nullifies all gun control laws. Not sure if I agree, but it is worth considering.

SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere

[Buttons12]

Obama appointed Kagan and Sotomayor. Corruptocrats confirmed them. He’s got 18 more months of opportunity. Who thinks Scalia, Alito and Thomas are lucky?
The dead pool money’s probably on Thomas to be swimming with the Fuddys by November 2016.

[headstamp 2]

Had a retired State Trooper friend (RIP) tell me decades ago after 30 years working with judges,

“The law is whatever a judge says it is”

[Paine in the Neck]

The text of the law - "Obamacare is not a tax"

Roberts court ruling - "Obamacare is not a tax"



The text of the law - "Obamacare does not permit subsidies"

Roberts court ruling - "Obamacare does not permit subsidies"



See the pattern? Consider...

Text - "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

[Lazamataz]

This is brilliant, Dean. Your copyright date is off a year.

[KrisKrinkle]

“The only hope for a return to Constitutional restraints is an end to the current administration.”

I don’t believe the end of the current administration will be enough.

Our side has substantially but not completely lost Academia and the Media, and other areas of society are compromised from our point of view. I’m not so sure a change in administration by itself will result in a return to Constitutional restraint.

I don’t maintain our cause is hopeless or that we should not fight for what we believe, but that more than a change in administration is necessary.