Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Terrifying Tentacles of One World Governance
Canada Free Press ^ | 09/06/15 | Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh

Posted on 09/06/2015 10:15:42 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Your socially-engineered and indoctrinated kids will be dancing and singing in school praises to the Blue Zone Project. Is it Orwellian enough for you yet?

The late Henry Lamb and Tom DeWeese have been working tirelessly for decades to unravel the thorny and terrifying tentacles of U.N.‘s Agenda 21, a soft law signed in 1992 by 178 countries. But the idea of a one world government/order has been around since the turn of the 20th century. It suffices to look at the back of a dollar bill to see the evidence. Featured prominently under the Masonic Pyramid are the Latin words, Novus Ordo Seclorum, the New World Order.

In 1891 Cecil Rhodes, of the Rhodes Scholarship fame, turned his dream, that the entire world should be governed by the British Empire, into the Society of the Elect (The Secret Society), the planting of the global governance seed. When they bought a place to headquarter his organization, it became the Chatham House Gang.

Across the ocean, Col. Edward Mandell House, Woodrow Wilson’s advisor and chief negotiator of the Treaty of Versailles, formed a group of like-minded fellows who called themselves The Inquiry. This group met with the Chatham House Gang in order to establish their two groups into a common effort and goal of globalization. The Chatham House Gang became the Royal Institute for International Affairs and The Inquiry became the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: agenda21; algerhiss; globalagenda; globalism; liberalagenda; newworldorder; nwo; oneworldgovernance; oneworldgovernment; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2015 10:15:42 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Bookmark for later.


2 posted on 09/06/2015 10:22:56 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I didn’t realize the One Worlders had been plotting so long. It’s for sure that Obama has been pushing this country into a submissive state since 2008. I DO NOT want any other countries to have any claim over us! THIS MUST STOP!


3 posted on 09/06/2015 10:38:22 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Anyone familiar with the Communist Constitution of Russia will recognize in the United Nations Charter a similar format. It is characterized by a fervent declaration of democratic principles which are sound and desirable; this is then followed by a constitutional restriction or procedural limitation which completely nullifies the principles just announced. For example, the Russian Constitution provides for universal suffrage and voting by secret ballot. Then, in Article 126, it provides for a single political party (the Communist Party) which will furnish the voters with a single roster of candidates. This, of course renders completely meaningless all the high-flown phrases dealing with universal suffrage and secret ballots. Freedom of the press is likewise guaranteed, and then wiped out by the provision that all writings must be “in the interest of the workers.”

In precisely this same way, the United Nations Charter provides for “the sovereign equality of all its members” (Article 1)—and then sets up a Security Council, which is dominated by five permanent members (Britain, Russia, China, France and the United States), any one of which can nullify the expressed desires of all other member nations by the simple device of exercising the veto power.

The Charter allows each member nation to have one vote in the General Assembly. This sounds like democracy, but then it provides that the General Assembly can do nothing more than make recommendations, and must refer all of its suggestions to the Security Council for action! (Articles 11-14). This makes the Security Council the only legally binding legislative body in the UN. To make this absolutely crystal clear the Charter provides in Article 24 that any nation which joins the UN must “agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.” This means that in spite of the bold declaration that the UN is “based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, the cold fact is that the members are all committed to obey the will of a handful of nations in the Security Council. As the next ten years dramatically demonstrated, all members of the UN—particularly the little nations—could be subjected to the chokehold which the USSR had provided for herself by holding membership in the Security Council and dominating that body through the frequent use of the veto power.

The Charter further provides that membership in the UN shall be restricted to “peace-loving” states (Article 4). This was thoroughly discussed at San Francisco, and Secretary John Foster Dulles has emphasized that the UN was designed to be a collective organization of friendly nations to preserve peace rather than an assemblage of all the nations in the world. In other words, the United Nations was built on the premise that its members would only include those nations which had had a demonstrated history of being “peace-loving.” Eight years after the adoption of the UN Charter, Secretary Dulles explained to the American Bar Association why the United Nations had failed to preserve the peace:
“Now we see the inadequacy of an organization whose effective functioning depends upon cooperation with a nation which is dominated by international party seeking world dominion.”
As some authorities have since pointed out, the UN provided for a worldwide police commission and then made the top international gangster a member of that commission. It was like setting up a fire department to put out the conflagration of war and then putting the world community’s foremost firebug on the department. From the point of view of the little nations, it was like promising to provide a good shepherd to protect the small, weak countries, and then appointing the wolf and all her pups to protect the flock.

All this became apparent during the “decade of disillusionment” which immediately followed. In 1945, however, a war-weary, hopeful free world felt the United Nations was all it purported to be—an organization for collective security designed to stand like a bastion against aggressor nations. …

The Naked Communist, Chapter 8
Seventy years of letting this abomination run amuck and people still act surprised?
4 posted on 09/06/2015 10:38:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

We see it today refugees that would probably still be in thier own country being driven out by a murderess band of muslims created and supported by the globalists to help along the calaphate to destroy isreal and to infest the world with animals, killing what ever is left of the free world with the cloward piven strategy, overwhelm the system into collapse. America victorious in WW2 cant muster up the fight and annihilate these bastard parasites? We have enemies within my friends


5 posted on 09/06/2015 10:40:51 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

bflr


6 posted on 09/06/2015 10:43:15 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

A swiss university computer modeled the relationships between all 48,000 publicly traded companies in the world and found 147 of these companies (Vanguard, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Union Bank of Switzerland, JP Morgan, etc) control more than 40% of the 48,000.

Of the 147, they are so interlocked in shares owned of each other and sharing of board members that these 147 companies can be thought of as one. Controlled by a small group of people. These are the oligarchs, old “royal” families of Europe and the Eastern Liberal Establishment families (Rockefellers, Mellons, Morgan, du Pont, etc).


7 posted on 09/06/2015 10:45:38 AM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The Antichrist is waiting in the wings..........Christians, look up! Your redemption draws nigh! “For here we have no continuing city, but we seek one to come.” Hebrews 13:14


8 posted on 09/06/2015 11:04:50 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The Naked Communist
And 'marxist-man' has much in common with 'muslim-man'!
9 posted on 09/06/2015 11:11:11 AM PDT by Mr Radical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Any “American” who says things like “I am a citizen of the world”, Or supports the US giving up its power to a world government and a world political elite, is a traitor. Mark them well.


10 posted on 09/06/2015 11:15:03 AM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The radical left wants ONE world government and one world currency. They can’t have it just yet, so they push for ONE Europe government, which they got. The reason is to transfer money from those who produce it, to those who lob around and collect the money.


11 posted on 09/06/2015 11:18:41 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Agenda 21/NWO/OWG is one subject that very few FReepers are interested in.


12 posted on 09/06/2015 11:29:46 AM PDT by B4Ranch (When buying + selling are controlled by legislation, the first things bought + sold are legislators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
It's pretty amazing seeing how quickly the Muslim masses have organized and moved this mass invasion into Europe and which will be “distributed” elsewhere once Merkle finds they will not remain in Military barracks any more then they would the refugee camps.

But then once Obama had his administration fully loaded with Muslims and the National Security positions....the rest was a piece of cake to move these masses into Europe...the Islamic leaders in the East knew Obama wouldn't stop them from the Islamic push of Jihad by Immigration....in fact he'd be helpful in setting the conditions for that to happen....which we've clearly seen.

Europe now will move "Central" to all the happenings of the middle east....for they're loaded with Muslims and will have no choice.....the refugees pushing through to Germany "forceably" against all means to stop the flow has proven Euorope will not stop this .

The news is all fuzzy good feeling about the making it through....what they aren't reporting is the threats etc. these Refugees gave the authorites that got them the transportation to continue....they are already using terroist threats against cities if they don't comply with their wishes.

13 posted on 09/06/2015 11:34:14 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

So freedom could be obtained with rather little spilled blood?


14 posted on 09/06/2015 11:44:41 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Lex rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Thanks to faux conservatives following anti Birchers.


15 posted on 09/06/2015 11:46:22 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Lex rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Kids Who Care
Love Wins

Fascism is now branded as warm and fuzzy. And those who don’t go along are the mean “haters” who need to be wiped out, drugged and killed by those who “care”.


16 posted on 09/06/2015 11:49:14 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
So freedom could be obtained with rather little spilled blood?

The best way to fight them I would think would be to

1) stop buying their stuff (buy locally from small businesses), and

2) figure out ways to live so that you avoid paying as much in tax as possible.

17 posted on 09/06/2015 11:52:04 AM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Pfl...


18 posted on 09/06/2015 2:57:13 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
In 1891 Cecil Rhodes, of the Rhodes Scholarship fame, turned his dream, that the entire world should be governed by the British Empire...

That would have been bad - but still better than the way things have turned out.

19 posted on 09/06/2015 3:02:33 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

>>It’s pretty amazing seeing how quickly the Muslim masses have organized and moved this mass invasion into Europe<<

I think the King of Saudi Arabia is behind all of this. It is part of a long term plan from back in the nineties. It doesn’t make sense that Soros is behind it. The way Obama bows down to King Salman makes me think he is the leading figure.


20 posted on 09/06/2015 3:42:31 PM PDT by B4Ranch (When buying + selling are controlled by legislation, the first things bought + sold are legislators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson