Like quarks.
Posted on 10/26/2015 3:31:48 PM PDT by dev.app.elizabeth
afsdfsaf
Took the words right out of my mouth.
OMG.. I found a great undead thread place.. even the title couldn’t be better... and it has that “aged” flavor ;^D
Don’t think you even have to ask for permission... this is the only post she/he/it ever posted (6+ years ago), and it only has 200, or so, posts ;o)
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).
Does anyone disagree?
U cannot leave teh Iterwebz they is forever. Even this post. OMG I get so much with this, this caste will I wish them do some thing about it. I mean, should you at some point arrrrrrrrrrrcquire some tincture of articulation and decide, hey, I need a career producing slick romantic fiction for the Atlantic, somebody there will do a web search and this little stinker will turn up in the inbox of every member of the editorial board by the time you’ve got the champagne chilled and the brie toasted or whatever the hell it is that they do with brie out there. I mean, you can’t use the stuff in a fondue and putting it on a Ritz cracker is pretty déclassé, so what are you really gonna do with it? I dunno. Which brings me to my next topic: why is it better to use a strawberry in a chocolate fondue than, say, an asparagus? At least you can dip the asparagus without getting your fingers burned. Sure, it makes your pee stink but it’s better than hearing Tina Brown squeal when you’re farting in the Atlantic boardroom, especially if you’ve been cheating with the pickled eggs like somebody I know but I’ll never do it again. I mean, who wants to pretend that the thin veneer of civilization is really all about THAT, Fondue, that is. You can’t fondue a pickled egg. Are you crazy?
Facebook decided there were 57 genders, and you could select one. I immediately complained, telling them my gender was not represented. Within a day, I got a response:
Facebook Representative: “We are so sorry we missed your identification. What is your indentified gender?”
Me: “I am Quantum-Gendered.”
Facebook Representative: “What is that?”
Me: “Quantum-Gendered means I neither male nor female, but a probability-wave. Upon observation, the probabilty-wave collapses and I become either male or female. You know, like the Shroedinger Cat experiment.”
Facebook Representative: “Ha ha. Very funny. Here, have a 30-day suspension.”
:) :) :)
Good morning. That’s your new gender?
You’re right! it IS a great Undead Thread place. But dangit, we just moved and haven’t even hit 500 yet. We have to run it up to 4000, at least.
How about if I bookmark it and pull it out of my hat when it’s time to move again? It’s too good to let it go!
And thank you!
;o]
I’ve bookmarked this, Laz, because it’s too good to let go, and as you know, we just moved.
Thanks, though! You and bikkuri can’t be wrong at the same time, can you? No. I thought not.
;o]
Yes. I have the famous physics thought-experiment: Schroedinger’s Genitals.
Well GOOD. You see, we in the Undead Thread have exhibited leadership by enhancing the facilitation of synergystic, scalable core-competancy paradigm-shifts vis-a-vis the most granular service point of difference, empowering the ongoing assurance of the thread architecture being functionally equivalent and parallel to the longitudinal business-practice shift postulated by the use of mission-critical management dialogue technology on a go-forward basis, in accordance with ISO-9003:2016 Sigma-Six standards.
Thirty days??? The most they gave me was three! LOL!!
So if you Quantum-Gendered, how will I recognize you? Oh, wait. By your wave, of course.
Like quarks.
Well, you can say what you want, but I like what you’ve done with the place.
BTW, it looks like you were summoned here back in 2015... but never came back around (I think it was Darksheare that pinged you)..
If/when you move over to here, don’t forget to thank Darksheare for the ping (to throw him off by 6 years) ;^D
She is still around.. she must be hovering over us somewhere ;^)
Thanks! That’s a good piece of info. At the time, though, Darks was pretty much in charge of the moves, and I was just the keeper of one of the ping lists. (Not to mention the fact that I wasn’t in a very good place.)
That changed when his father passed, so I took the mantle to ease his burdens somewhat.
I still miss the man, and every once in a while, I’ll run across a FReepmail from him where he was helping me with a computer problem. It hurts my heart to think he’s not still with us.
Not really. The grammar and syntax is waaay off.
“Schroedinger’s Genitals.”
Actually, that is a thing: “We thought you had balls but we’ve haven’t seen you use them yet.” Said that to many in my time. I like to talk smack.
Darksheare is still with us. I think you meant Darkwing104.. I was wondering what happened to him .. :(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.