INTJ IBTZ
My cat’s breath smells like cat food.
“The Today’s Show’sâ€
Yeah, but what if you’re wrong.
Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinus alacribus et fructuosis potiri potes!
Took the words right out of my mouth.
OMG.. I found a great undead thread place.. even the title couldn’t be better... and it has that “aged” flavor ;^D
Don’t think you even have to ask for permission... this is the only post she/he/it ever posted (6+ years ago), and it only has 200, or so, posts ;o)
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).
Does anyone disagree?
You joined FR in 2015, and this is your first post, 6 years later.
Are you a new hire in the influence center, that just got given this ID and assigned to FR?
You’re the teacher in Houston, aren’t you...
Yeah, but what if you're wrong?