[Fai Mao]

An interesting post from an interesting blog

[Bob434]

accept Christ as Savior- then a person will know God exists and not have to wonder any longer- God reveals His existence to those who humble themselves before Him

[dp0622]

great little article. they are teenage brats.

[Orangebowl]

I love this articles

[Moonman62]

Let’s define “God” as the “supernatural being who created the Universe.” That is, God is the cosmological singularity. To see this, unpack the definition of “God.” The word “supernatural” literally means “above nature,” or outside of space and time, and not subject to the laws of physics…the cosmological singularity is the cause of everything that exists, but is itself uncaused.

...

Looks like an argument for a Deist God, which a lot of religious people don’t like.

[Fhios]

Pascal’s wager

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager

[Mechanicos]

Scientific Method, Statistical probability, etc tends to support the Existence of God and confirms the accuracy of his Word.

http://www.bibleevidences.com/
http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t003.html
http://www.gotquestions.org/which-book.html
http://www.inplainsite.org/html/scientific_facts_in_the_bible.html#SFB02

[Twinkie]

Some say there was a BIG BANG that caused creation;
but who or what caused the BIG BANG?

[metmom]

All of creation screams of God.

It’s not a matter of whether there is *proof* of God’s existence, as if only science is capable of proving He exists and without science, there is no proof.

It’s a matter of whether or not the person chooses to acknowledge that proof of God’s existence.

People don’t not believe because they can’t but because they won’t. Ability is never the issue. WILL is.

[metmom]

ping

[jaydee770]

The few self-identified “proud” athiests I’ve had the discussion with tend to fit the “bratty teenager” described in the article. My impression is that — if they choose the religious “model”, they have to deal with a lifetime/lifestyle full of bad decisions, transgressions and guilt. If they choose the scientific “model”, they can plausibly ignore and deny any personal culpability & responsibility for the choices they’ve made in life and suppress the guilt more easily.

Again, don’t know about all athiests, but the ones I’ve had this discussion with have all been consistent. You can tell them that the church is not a confined box full of perfect people but rather an open workshop for broken people... They don’t want to hear it.

[Agamemnon]

By definition the "atheist" has to be his own creator -- there is none greater than himself and his self-important ego, yet for all the complexity evident in the design, the "atheist" can tell you neither how nor when nor why he allegedly chose to design himself thusly.

And therein he ensnares his arrogance, stepping in his own incompetence, and as he tries to scrape the collective odoriferous mass off his shoe, I'll continue to just stand there and laugh at him.

FReegards!