Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Obviously a Major Malfunction”
The Radio Patriot ^ | Jan. 25, 2016 | Andrea Shea King

Posted on 01/28/2016 9:25:23 AM PST by patriotgal1787

I was working with NASA as a public information officer attached to the press site at Kennedy Space Center. My job that morning was to deliver pre-launch commentary at the communication console inside the Launch Control Center at the Cape.

I began my shift at the microphone at about 3am, about the time the tanking operations got underway when millions of pounds of pressurized hypergolic fuels were being pumped into the behemoth at Launch Pad 39-B as the seven astronauts breakfasted before suiting up for the big event.

(Excerpt) Read more at radiopatriot.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Science
KEYWORDS: challenger; launchcommentary; nasa; spaceshuttle
An insider's story of what happened 30 years ago by a NASA Public Affairs officer who was in the Launch Control Center when Challenger exploded.
1 posted on 01/28/2016 9:25:23 AM PST by patriotgal1787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

IIRC, it was an “o” ring.


2 posted on 01/28/2016 9:27:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

My dad worked for Morton Thiokol at the time.


3 posted on 01/28/2016 9:29:40 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

An o-ring that was not suited for the cold weather that day, and the engineers new it.

NASA made big budgetary promises they could not keep, ignored the whistleblower, and killed 7 people.


4 posted on 01/28/2016 9:29:50 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (Radical Muslims want to behead you, moderateate Muslims want to watch and cheer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

That is the official story. However, on the morning of the launch there was a crack in the support structure connecting the shuttle to the fuel tank. Vibration during flight broke the structure and punctured the fuel tank under the rear of the shuttle. There is evidence for this in Challenger videos. Just before the explosion there is fire just under the rear of the shuttle next to the fuel tank. Secondly watch the video of the boosters after the explosion. Both are flying in an identical fashion with exhaust coming from the rear nozzle indicating the solid fuel is still burning. There is no indication of a burn through to damage the fuel tank on either booster which would still have been spewing smoke from the O-ring burn through.

The video of Ronald Reagans speech is clear on these issues. A contractor took the hit and NASA was protected.


5 posted on 01/28/2016 9:36:11 AM PST by strings6459
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

bfl


6 posted on 01/28/2016 9:39:28 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

At the time, I was the Plans and Operations Officer for the 8th Infantry Division in Bad Kreuznach, Germany. I was called from my office by my guys in the Emergency Action Center. They had Armed Forces Network on the TV and they were getting the CNN feed. They were looping the explosion every few seconds. After a quick look, I walked down the hall to the Division Chief of Staff and told him what had happened and walked him back to the Emergency Action Center.

We had a contingency plan for any emergency related to the Space Shuttle, primarily for security in case the shuttle was forced to land in Spain or North Africa. The Chief of Staff was a bit of a nervous nelly in times like this so he ordered me to start alert for our contingency and to get the division in gear. I pointed out that I did not believe that any of the pieces would make it to Spain or Africa, but he was not having any of it. So the orders went out and I called the Corps and USAREUR EACs and told them they we were alerting and would be ready if needed. One of the comments was that this was serious and they didn’t need any joking around. We got a stand down message promptly.


7 posted on 01/28/2016 10:07:07 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strings6459
If you watch the video of the launch itself, you can see a flash where the flame from the SRB burns through the o-ring.

I believe the "official" story.

8 posted on 01/28/2016 10:31:44 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

A flash but no smoke from the burning propellant. Not possible.


9 posted on 01/28/2016 10:36:11 AM PST by strings6459
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe; All

And the really sad thing is the whole Space Shuttle program was a major waste of resources. We could of built something like 50 more Saturn V rockets and sent a lot more astronauts and payloads into orbit—for the billions we spent on the boondoggle of the Shuttle.

The re-usable aspect of the Shuttle was supposed to make it more economical....and it fit in well with the Boomer preoccupation with recycling, but that was all bunk. Used up a lot more money/time/resources, and in this case, lives....than if we’d relied on the tried and true rocket technology developed in Apollo.

The Russians are still using the same kinds of booster rockets they developed in the ‘60s...with rock solid reliability (and no ceasing of sending people up....).


10 posted on 01/28/2016 11:03:21 AM PST by AnalogReigns (Real life is ANALOG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

My memory of the event is sort of macabre - there was at about the same time as the launch was scheduled also to be a major prize fight - I don’t remember between whom - but as I walked into the house at noon right after the disaster, my wife announced to me that “the Challenger blew up” and it took me a minute to grasp that she was talking about the space flight and not one of the fighters in the upcoming ring battle - just to add a little more bizarreness to the picture....


11 posted on 01/28/2016 11:21:24 AM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strings6459
There is no indication of a burn through to damage the fuel tank on either booster which would still have been spewing smoke from the O-ring burn through.

Actually there is video of it. There was a o ring failure period.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXiQGs1QaIs

12 posted on 01/28/2016 12:06:58 PM PST by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: strings6459
Considering the craft was moving at several hundred miles an hour, I suspect the small amount of smoke would have dissipated quickly.

I also recall that the Rodgers Commission found pieces of the External Fuel Tank that showed evidence of being burned through, almost like a plasma torch had been taken to them. That matches up with the official inquiry.

13 posted on 01/28/2016 12:47:49 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Imagine knowing and you did nothing about it


14 posted on 01/29/2016 2:52:37 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Understatement of the century?


15 posted on 01/29/2016 2:56:04 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson