>>(Donning asbestos flame-retardant suit) <<
Why?
Every guy who has been through “divorce” (actually “dissolution of marriage — divorce is probably only in a few states) knows the deck is stacked against him.
A woman can have an affair in front of her husbands eyes, kick the husband out of the house, get a restraining order to keep husband from coming home, sell everything he owns, including his clothes, give his booze to her BF, snd he has NO recourse.
When they get to court, HE invariable pays spousal support, no matter her financial situation. After many years, even with no kids, he MIGHT get a sliver of what is left of what he once owned, less her huge take of his retirement.
Kids? HAHAHAHAHAHA — she gets them, gets child support which she uses for herself and not the kids with no recourse. Ex-hubbie pays for her and new BF to live in the style they want with no work and him as an ATM.
If he kicks, she hauls him into court every other week with HER lawyer billing HIM for the privilege.
Family Law favors women: YA THINK????
[Every guy who has been through “divorce†(actually “dissolution of marriage — divorce is probably only in a few states) knows the deck is stacked against him.]
Sounds about right. The husband’s side of the family suffers too.
It does indeed sir, and probably will for, oh let's see, about the next 750,000 years. In other words, it's not going to end anytime soon.
Men have the same recourse that every other group that has faced discrimination has done, which is to unite and fight back. By not fighting back, they are consenting to the system that is shafting them. After all, silence is consent.