Skip to comments.
Godfather Trump Now Threatens Cub Owners
American Thinker ^
| February 24, 2016
| Daniel John Sobieski
Posted on 02/24/2016 10:03:04 AM PST by raptor22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: subterfuge
Trumpâhits back hard.â same as Obama.Sadly there appears to be as many similarities as differences between the two.
41
posted on
02/24/2016 10:35:29 AM PST
by
catfish1957
(I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
To: euram
The gravy train is about to be DERAILED. Choke on it, Ricketts gang.
42
posted on
02/24/2016 10:35:40 AM PST
by
Third Person
(Andmoreagain)
To: JJ_Folderol; MNJohnnie
How brave of you to say that while you hide behind the internet. Lol...right back at you big boy.
43
posted on
02/24/2016 10:36:32 AM PST
by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: Slyfox
Why does threaten people when he does not get his way?Because he's a Liberal at heart.
44
posted on
02/24/2016 10:37:54 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Why do we give our hearts to the past? And why must we grow up so fast?)
To: raptor22
American Thinker is now on the Trump Enemies list.
Article after article tries to trash Trump. I don’t see any supporting him. Damn shame that power corrupts, even those with good intentions.
45
posted on
02/24/2016 10:38:56 AM PST
by
Kenny
(RED)
To: raptor22
46
posted on
02/24/2016 10:40:56 AM PST
by
Company Man
(Trump towers.)
To: Talisker
No I’m advocating for someone who will enforce the law equally and equitably for all citizens.
Ya know like our Founding Fathers envisioned.
I know that may be a stretch for you.
47
posted on
02/24/2016 10:41:49 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: subterfuge
Should Trump not defend himself from big money establishment attacks?
48
posted on
02/24/2016 10:42:29 AM PST
by
Third Person
(Andmoreagain)
To: MNJohnnie
Aren’t you special.
Why are you putting things in quotes that I never said? Perhaps because you were thinking it.
We have a bully in the White House now. We don’t need a worse one.
But I guess you like using the alphabet agencies to keep people in line when they don’t support dear leader.
49
posted on
02/24/2016 10:43:25 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Third Person
50
posted on
02/24/2016 10:44:47 AM PST
by
beandog
(TrumperTantrum)
To: subterfuge
Yep and some Freepers are A OK with it. Because their chosen One told them he would use it for good.
51
posted on
02/24/2016 10:46:36 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: raptor22
Another crybaby “story”. “Trump is soooooo mean!!! He can’t be president because he is TOO MEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNN!!!”
Either grow a pair or hide in your “safe place”, wussies.
52
posted on
02/24/2016 10:48:42 AM PST
by
TheStickman
(If we don't elect a PRO-America president in 2016 we lose the country!)
To: raptor22
The media will throw him softballs and give him a pass until they have eliminated any real threats. Then he will face either the Hildebeest or Sanders or some other Democrat and there will be no quarter—for Trump. They’re playing rope-a dope.
53
posted on
02/24/2016 10:55:41 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: raptor22
For some reason, people are allowed to attack Trump with millions of dollars and he is not right to respond.
That’s ignorant.
Of course he’s right to respond.
54
posted on
02/24/2016 10:56:43 AM PST
by
xzins
(Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/qa)
To: Talisker
You're advocating outright incompetency now? Yeah, that'll work. I prefer an incompetent government to an efficient and hostile one.
You might want to give that some thought.
We used to cheer when the government was 'shut down' because they'd be doing less damage.
55
posted on
02/24/2016 10:58:11 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Smokin' Joe
I prefer an incompetent government to an efficient and hostile one. You might want to give that some thought. Give what thought - criticizing candidates for their competency? Great strategy, yeah, I'll take it under advisement. Thanks so much.
56
posted on
02/24/2016 11:01:23 AM PST
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: silverleaf
Or maybe you prefer the dignified nonresponse of the fatally politically pummelled GWB, that tore down his entire administration and legacy and brought us Barack Obama.It took a long line of mentors and investors to bring us Barrack Obama, who without fraud, the FSA, and the complicit media would never have been elected.
But....
Bush's Fault! Right?
57
posted on
02/24/2016 11:01:30 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: raptor22
The thing these pathetic twits on the so called conservative blogs don’t seem capable of learning is that gentlemen don’t win political campaigns. Not in the big leagues.
If Mitt had gone scorched earth on OFail like he did on Newt in Florida he would be President Romney right now.
58
posted on
02/24/2016 11:05:11 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Talisker
Maybe give giving thought some thought, and reread the comment I responded to.
59
posted on
02/24/2016 11:05:51 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: driftdiver
No I'm advocating for someone who will enforce the law equally and equitably for all citizens. Ya know like our Founding Fathers envisioned. I know that may be a stretch for you. Look who's talking about our Founding Fathers - and getting it wrong. FYI, our Founding Fathers were cynics who built a government based on the belief that no honest men would ever be found to run it. That's why they split it into the three parts that are always supposed to be against each other. Except now all three parts work together, and where's that gotten us? Trump will work against the other parts, just as our Founding Father's intended. That's a good thing, not a bad thing. But you keep criticizing his strengths. After all, it's not like anyone will see how much you get wrong.
60
posted on
02/24/2016 11:07:32 AM PST
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson