Do you ever tire of going to threads just to post drivel because you think you have some sort of duty to mock a person’s right to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?
You thereby mislead people without a legal background to imagine the law is not the law. You don't get the basic message that no court would be caught dead treating birther fantasy as "law." However, you apparently hallucinate that if you repeat the same old BS just another 186,000 times as though it were not BS, maybe some how, some way, some eccentric or senile excuse for a judge might agree with your utterly discredited nonsense. Wishin' and hopin', right?
The constitution is not what you hallucinate it to be just because you really, really, REALLY want it to be so. Grow up! Oh, and I am mocking your attempt to distort the constitution of the United States to suit your purposes. I also question the motives of birthers who seem to have nothing more important to worry about than to push their obsession at the expense of the country. And yes, I get very tired of dealing with this idiocy but I will persist in the best interest of my country.
"Constitutional" fantasy: birtherism. Real constitutional issues: (1) the death of 60+ million innocents and counting under an utterly non-existent "constitutional" guarantee made up of whole cloth by SCOTUS in violation of the Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments of a woman's "right to choose to butcher her baby," (2) the SCOTUS ban on prayer in public places in direct violation of the First Amendment, (3) the SCOTUS policy inflicting a non-existent "constitutional" right to formalized sexual perversion gay "marriage" and, by implication, "gay" everything else on the states in direct violation of the Tenth Amendment and, certainly in no way a goal of the Fourteenth Amendment, (4) the steady federal encroachment on the powers of states and the people in our actual constitutional system of federalism, (5) the continued restoration of the actual Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms which gives hope that sanity and law may be restored on social issues.
But, of what possible significance can there be to the right to keep and bear arms, the right to life itself, the normalcy of marriage, the ongoing death of real federalism, the freedom of worship, when birthers instead prefer to install the constitutionally clueless old Manhattan Motormouth in the White House to continue to ignore these and many other constitutional crises to play "Let's Make a Deal" with Schmucky Chewmer, Nancy Pelosi, Her Royal Thighness, and every other enemy of the American constitution rather than actual conservatives. The Donald will likely appoint several Whoopsies (like Souter, O'Connor, John Paul Stevens, and others with "New York values") who will somehow continue the anticonstitutional norms as wasted "Republican SCOTUS nominees."
I personally don't care if Ted Cruz was born on the planet Jupiter. His mother is an American and so is he. Ditto Marco Rubio, Barry Goldwater, George Romney (maybe), Mitt Romney (maybe), Lowell Weicker (whom I hate above all other political slime), Chester Arthur, John McCain, and, yes, Barack Insane Obozo. Only Cruz and Rubio are trustworthy on court appointments. Get used to the fact that future POTUS pools will be replete with candidates who have one foreign parent or were born off of American soil to at least one citizen. NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING in the constitution prohibits that and in our highly mobile society, it will become more and more common.
That you have no actual issues against Cruz is your problem not mine but that is the real reason for this anal retentive ongoing infantile temper tantrum of the "birthers."
Speaking of which, just for variety, don't you want to re-invent and re-introduce the other old chestnuts about isolationism (whose real enemy is interventionism which ought to be a norm whenever practical and desirable), the Illuminati, the "international bankers' conspiracy, Israel's alleged stranglehold on the State Department, the Bilderbergers, the Warburgs, the Rothschilds, the Trilateralists, and all those other not so golden moldy oldies that have failed for soooooo many years and rightfully so as "issues?" And how about that banjo player from the film Deliverance? Shouldn't he be on SCOTUS or maybe even POTUS? A real NBC that one.