Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin

Yeah, the “British Common Law” people make me laugh. Don’t they realize that we fought a revolution against British Common Law


220 posted on 04/09/2016 9:59:02 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman
we fought a revolution against British Common Law

And therein lie the obfuscation, we did not fight a war against British ‘common’ law, we fought a war against British ‘feudal’ law. There is ‘common’ law and there are the laws of the king's prerogative, these are the feudal laws by which mankind becomes slaves to the king because the king is sovereign. Under common law, the sovereignty is in the people.

Common law is the ancient, unwritten law known as jus commune. Its existence predates that of any human king or nation.

Feudal law is the law created by any given king & his government known as jura corona or lex prerogative.

http://lonang.com/library/reference/tucker-blackstone-notes-reference/tuck-1e/

United States law is a combination of jus commune and jus corona. Congress was given no authority to regulate jus commune as those laws existed before any kings or nation, they are laws of our Creator that mankind was given no authority to regulate in His Name. So the ruse is, while there were laws common to Great Britain, those laws were not jus commune, they were jus corona written specifically for the kings territories.

Shalom

226 posted on 04/09/2016 11:53:31 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson