Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin
-- shouldn't focus of the briefs that Elliot's lawyers filed been more finely tuned to making their argument that Cruz is a naturalized citizen, thereby leaving the court with the only conclusion that Cruz is not a Constitutional art. 1 `natural born' citizen? --

I agree with that. However, from news reports, it appears that Pellegrini does not see "naturalized" and "natural born" as mutually exclusive. Unless you know he is of that mind to begin with, you wouldn't find the case law or other resource that sets out the principle that "naturalized" and "natural born" are mutually exclusive.

258 posted on 04/09/2016 2:50:09 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Unless you know he is of that mind to begin with...

That is interesting as one of the first topics Scalia addresses is getting to know the mindset of a judge. Researching his past, his likes, his associates and any available literature that the judge has written that may pertain to your case. I will have to do some research on Pellegrini's bio.

263 posted on 04/09/2016 3:48:43 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson